htmx — Core Web Vitals

82.0% of htmx sites pass all three Core Web Vitals

#1 of 11 frameworks by overall pass rate
Add TTFB and only 50.8% still pass
Runs on 0.1% of all sites measured (301 crawled htmx sites, 205 with phone field data)

The distribution, not just the median

Each bar is the good / needs-work / poor split for htmx. The marks where the whole fleet sits, so you can see who is ahead and who is behind.

LCP 2.0s p75

90.1% good ▲ fleet 81.8%

INP 130ms p75

97.2% good ▲ fleet 91.8%

CLS 0.01 p75

93.1% good ▲ fleet 88.9%

TTFB diagnostic 1.1s p75

57.4% good ▼ fleet 59.0%

FCP diagnostic 1.6s p75

83.4% good ▲ fleet 75.5%

htmx is strong across the board. Even its weakest metric, TTFB (57.4% good), is ahead of the fleet’s 59.0%. The fingerprint shows the habits behind it.

framework standings

#1 htmx 82.0% #2 Alpine 78.3% #3 React 73.6% #4 jQuery 70.2% #5 Svelte 65.3% #6 Vue 62.5% #7 Nuxt 48.3% #8 Remix 46.9% #9 Next.js 42.6% #10 Gatsby 38.8% #11 Angular 37.1%

All frameworks →

210,902 crawled sites (126,761 with phone Chrome field data), representing millions of real page loads, October 2026 edition. How we measured.