CoreDash PULSE - Free Core Web Vitals report

Generate a full Core Web Vitals report based on your site's CrUX history

CrUX historical Core Web Vitals report for your page

Enter the URL of the page for which you want to create get the CrUX data for and enjoy our free report!

UX Happiness Score

Hi there,

We've got some good news! Our CoreDash Pulse system detected improvements in key page speed metrics for your mobile web environment on www.example.com over the past 3 months. This means your pages are loading faster for your users, which can lead to a better overall experience and potentially higher conversions.

Cumulative Layout Shift
0.00 ↝ 0.00
stable
Time to First Byte
000 ↝ 000
stable
First Contentful Paint
000 ↝ 000
stable
Interaction to Next Paint
000 ↝ 000
stable%
Largest Contentful Paint
000 ↝ 000
stable


Paint & Loading performance

Largest Contentful Paint
--
needs improvement

LCP distribution

0
25
50
75
100
dec
march
april
Time to First Byte
--
needs improvement

TTFB distribution

0
25
50
75
100
dec
march
april
First Contentful Paint
--
needs improvement

FCP distribution

0
25
50
75
100
dec
march
april

The Loading performance of your site (measured by the Largest Contentful Paint) has improved by 10% over the last 3 months. This is a great improvement and will lead to a better user experience.

The Time to First Byte of your site has has improved by 00% over the last 6 months. This is a great improvement and will lead to a better user experience

Finally the First Contentful paint has improved as well. The time between the TTFB and the FCP will give a great indication of how fast your site is able to start rendering and should preferably be below 400ms

LCP Break Down


LCP Resource Types




Stay Ahead of the Curve: Sign Up for Core Web Vitals Alerts!

Sign up for our FREE alerts and get notified instantly when Google changes the Core Web Vitals game! Sign up today and unlock the power of staying informed.

What you'll receive:

  • Timely email notifications about Core Web Vitals updates.
  • Straightforward explanations of the changes and their implications.
  • Actionable tips to keep your website optimized for success. ✅

Here's why you should sign up:

  • Be the first to know: Never miss a critical update that could impact your website's performance and SEO.
  • Stay informed: Get clear, concise explanations of what the changes mean and how they affect your site.
  • Gain an edge: Stay ahead of the competition by optimizing your website for the latest Core Web Vitals standards.
  • Free and easy: Sign up takes just seconds, and there are no hidden fees. 🆓



Visual Stability

Cumulative layout shift
--
needs improvement

CLS distribution

0
25
50
75
100
dec
march
april

There's even more good news! Our data shows a significant improvement in Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) for your mobile site. CLS decreased from 0.02 to 0.01 (a reduction of 50%). This means users are much less likely to experience unexpected layout shifts while the page loads, leading to a smoother and more predictable user experience. Great work! This improvement will likely have a positive impact on user satisfaction and engagement.




Interactivity

Interaction to Next Paint
--
needs improvement

INP distribution

0
25
50
75
100
dec
march
april

We've got even more good news to share! Our data shows a positive improvement in Interaction to Next Paint (INP) for your mobile site. INP decreased from 283.58ms to 278.15ms (a reduction of 2%). This means users will experience a slightly faster response time when interacting with your website elements, like buttons or links. While the improvement might seem small in milliseconds, it can make a noticeable difference in perceived responsiveness. A smoother and more responsive user experience can lead to higher engagement and conversions. Keep up the good work! This optimization contributes to a more user-friendly mobile experience.




Devices

Device distribution

Understanding device distribution helps prioritize mobile optimization. Most users access your website from mobile devices, making it crucial to ensure a smooth mobile experience.




Navigation types

Navigation Types




How to improve these score?

View the full CoreDash Pulse report here This report provides a more detailed analysis of the regressions and might highlight potential areas for improvement.

Investigate potential causes:

Consider any recent changes made to your website or infrastructure that could be contributing to the slowdown.

Contact CoreDash support (Optional)

Our team is happy to assist you in diagnosing the root cause of the regression and suggest solutions. You can reach us at support@corewebvitals.io

Additionally:

The issue tracker functionality within CoreDash Pulse is currently unavailable because RUM tracking is disabled. If you'd like to leverage this feature to pinpoint specific performance bottlenecks, you can re-enable RUM tracking here. We understand that page speed is critical, and we're here to help!

lighthouse 100 score



What does this Core Web Vitals report show?

Type a domain or one URL, pick mobile or desktop, and the report pulls 25 weeks of field data from Google's CrUX History API. You get a weekly chart for LCP, INP and CLS, plus TTFB and FCP. Your LCP can never be faster than either of them. It works for any site with enough Chrome traffic, a competitor's too.

Under the loading charts the LCP is split into its four parts. Further down you find CLS and INP over time, then devices and navigation types. Those last two, and the image or text share of the LCP, are for all devices together, whichever toggle you picked.

How to read the weekly CrUX charts

One bar is one week. Hover over it for the p75 of that week and the share of good, needs improvement and poor page loads.

The p75 is the number Google judges you on: three out of four page loads were at least this good.

  • LCP is good up to 2.5 s and poor above 4 s
  • INP is good up to 200 ms and poor above 500 ms
  • CLS is good up to 0.1 and poor above 0.25

You pass the Core Web Vitals when all three are good at p75.

The badge on each metric card is the direction of a straight line drawn through all the weeks. The summary at the top compares the average p75 of the older half of the weeks with the newer half. The UX happiness score next to it is my own number: the share of good page loads in the latest week, averaged over LCP, INP, CLS, FCP and TTFB. Google doesn't use it, and there is no official Core Web Vitals score anyway.

Where does the CrUX data come from?

From Chrome on Android and desktop, for users who sync their history and share usage statistics with Google. Chrome on iPhone isn't in it. Neither is Edge.

Each weekly point covers the 28 days before it, so the points overlap. A fix that goes live on a Tuesday takes about four points to show in full.

Google adds a new point every Monday with data up to the Saturday before, so on Monday the newest point is two days old. The 28 days are how wide each window is, which is why the 28-day delay is a myth.

This is what visitors got on their own devices. PageSpeed Insights runs Lighthouse once, from a Google server, with a slow phone and network simulated. Lighthouse never clicks anything, so it has no INP at all. A 98 in Lighthouse and a red INP line here can both be true.

How is this different from the Core Web Vitals report in Search Console?

Search Console reads the same CrUX data, for your own sites only. It groups URLs that behave alike and labels each group by its worst metric over the last 28 days.

Search Console tells you which group of pages fails. The weekly bars here help you find the week it started, and from there the release.

What to check when a metric gets worse

Stay on mobile first (the report opens there): it is almost always the worse of the two. Then look at the shape of the line.

A deploy shows as a climb over about four weeks that then levels off: a new theme, a tag added in Tag Manager, a hero image that got loading="lazy". Look up what went live in the week the climb starts.

A line that keeps creeping up for months is usually third-party scripts piling up.

For LCP, open the breakdown chart and see which part grew. It only counts page loads where the LCP element is an image. More TTFB points at the server or the cache. A longer load delay means the browser finds the LCP image late. A longer load duration is a heavier image or a slow connection to where it is hosted. Growing render delay is CSS or JavaScript holding back the paint.

What CrUX history can't tell you

Small sites get no data. Google needs a lot of Chrome visits and won't say how many. Pages with a noindex or a status other than 200 are left out too. Is your URL empty? Try the whole domain. The report tries with and without www for you.

Even with data, you get one p75 per metric per week for the whole domain or one popular URL. CrUX doesn't say which template is slow, which element moves or which script holds up the click.

That takes real user monitoring on your own site. I built CoreDash for it: the page loads on your own site, with the LCP element and the slow interaction attached, so you see a fix work within hours.

Free Core Web Vitals Report from CrUX History Core Web Vitals Free Core Web Vitals Report from CrUX History