htmx — Core Web Vitals

79.8% of htmx sites pass all three Core Web Vitals

#1 of 11 frameworks by overall pass rate
Add TTFB and only 50.6% still pass
Runs on 0.1% of all sites measured (301 crawled htmx sites, 285 with field data)

The distribution, not just the median

Each bar is the good / needs-work / poor split for htmx. The marks where the whole fleet sits, so you can see who is ahead and who is behind.

LCP 1.9s p75

90.5% good ▲ fleet 82.5%

INP 108ms p75

98.8% good ▲ fleet 94.7%

CLS 0.03 p75

87.3% good ▼ fleet 87.8%

TTFB diagnostic 1.1s p75

58.5% good ▼ fleet 58.7%

FCP diagnostic 1.5s p75

82.8% good ▲ fleet 76.6%

htmx is strong across the board. Even its weakest metric, CLS (87.3% good), is ahead of the fleet’s 87.8%. The fingerprint shows the habits behind it.

framework standings

#1 htmx 79.8% #2 Alpine 79.4% #3 React 76.1% #4 jQuery 70.4% #5 Svelte 67.3% #6 Vue 63.6% #7 Remix 58.7% #8 Gatsby 48.6% #9 Nuxt 48.1% #10 Next.js 46.5% #11 Angular 37.4%

All frameworks →

210,902 crawled sites (196,263 with Chrome field data), representing millions of real page loads, October 2026 edition. How we measured.