The State of Web Vitals · Framework

Angular — Core Web Vitals

Field data PhoneDesktopAll October 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
37.1% of Angular sites pass all three Core Web Vitals
  • #11 of 11 frameworks by overall pass rate
  • Add TTFB and only 29.0% still pass
  • Runs on 1.6% of all sites measured (3,377 crawled Angular sites, 2,301 with phone field data)

The distribution, not just the median

Each bar is the good / needs-work / poor split for Angular. The marks where the whole fleet sits, so you can see who is ahead and who is behind.

LCP 2.9s p75
64.9% good ▼ fleet 81.8%
INP 191ms p75
78.8% good ▼ fleet 91.8%
CLS 0.26 p75
58.2% good ▼ fleet 88.9%
TTFB diagnostic 745ms p75
77.2% good ▲ fleet 59.0%
FCP diagnostic 2.0s p75
68.5% good ▼ fleet 75.5%
Where Angular loses ground: CLS — 58.2% of sites pass, against 88.9% across the fleet. The fingerprint below shows which habits move that number.

framework standings

#1 htmx 82.0% #2 Alpine 78.3% #3 React 73.6% #4 jQuery 70.2% #5 Svelte 65.3% #6 Vue 62.5% #7 Nuxt 48.3% #8 Remix 46.9% #9 Next.js 42.6% #10 Gatsby 38.8% #11 Angular 37.1%
All frameworks →

210,902 crawled sites (126,761 with phone Chrome field data), representing millions of real page loads, October 2026 edition. How we measured.