The State of Web Vitals · Framework

Next.js — Core Web Vitals

Field data PhoneDesktopAll October 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
46.5% of Next.js sites pass all three Core Web Vitals
  • #10 of 11 frameworks by overall pass rate
  • Add TTFB and only 36.6% still pass
  • Runs on 0.9% of all sites measured (1,832 crawled Next.js sites, 1,774 with field data)

The distribution, not just the median

Each bar is the good / needs-work / poor split for Next.js. The marks where the whole fleet sits, so you can see who is ahead and who is behind.

LCP 2.1s p75
85.2% good ▲ fleet 82.5%
INP 233ms p75
67.5% good ▼ fleet 94.7%
CLS 0.17 p75
66.2% good ▼ fleet 87.8%
TTFB diagnostic 877ms p75
69.1% good ▲ fleet 58.7%
FCP diagnostic 1.5s p75
84.2% good ▲ fleet 76.6%
Where Next.js loses ground: INP — 67.5% of sites pass, against 94.7% across the fleet. The fingerprint below shows which habits move that number.

framework standings

#1 htmx 79.8% #2 Alpine 79.4% #3 React 76.1% #4 jQuery 70.4% #5 Svelte 67.3% #6 Vue 63.6% #7 Remix 58.7% #8 Gatsby 48.6% #9 Nuxt 48.1% #10 Next.js 46.5% #11 Angular 37.4%
All frameworks →

210,902 crawled sites (196,263 with Chrome field data), representing millions of real page loads, October 2026 edition. How we measured.