The State of Web Vitals · Framework

jQuery — Core Web Vitals

Field data PhoneDesktopAll October 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
70.4% of jQuery sites pass all three Core Web Vitals
  • #4 of 11 frameworks by overall pass rate
  • Add TTFB and only 43.3% still pass
  • Runs on 68.0% of all sites measured (143,509 crawled jQuery sites, 138,472 with field data)

The distribution, not just the median

Each bar is the good / needs-work / poor split for jQuery. The marks where the whole fleet sits, so you can see who is ahead and who is behind.

LCP 2.3s p75
80.7% good ▼ fleet 82.5%
INP 104ms p75
96.7% good ▲ fleet 94.7%
CLS 0.04 p75
88.4% good ▲ fleet 87.8%
TTFB diagnostic 1.4s p75
51.3% good ▼ fleet 58.7%
FCP diagnostic 1.9s p75
73.1% good ▼ fleet 76.6%
Where jQuery loses ground: TTFB — 51.3% of sites pass, against 58.7% across the fleet. The fingerprint below shows which habits move that number.

framework standings

#1 htmx 79.8% #2 Alpine 79.4% #3 React 76.1% #4 jQuery 70.4% #5 Svelte 67.3% #6 Vue 63.6% #7 Remix 58.7% #8 Gatsby 48.6% #9 Nuxt 48.1% #10 Next.js 46.5% #11 Angular 37.4%
All frameworks →

210,902 crawled sites (196,263 with Chrome field data), representing millions of real page loads, October 2026 edition. How we measured.