The State of Web Vitals · Framework

Nuxt — Core Web Vitals

Field data PhoneDesktopAll October 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
48.1% of Nuxt sites pass all three Core Web Vitals
  • #9 of 11 frameworks by overall pass rate
  • Add TTFB and only 34.1% still pass
  • Runs on 0.6% of all sites measured (1,309 crawled Nuxt sites, 1,272 with field data)

The distribution, not just the median

Each bar is the good / needs-work / poor split for Nuxt. The marks where the whole fleet sits, so you can see who is ahead and who is behind.

LCP 2.6s p75
71.9% good ▼ fleet 82.5%
INP 157ms p75
88.3% good ▼ fleet 94.7%
CLS 0.14 p75
69.3% good ▼ fleet 87.8%
TTFB diagnostic 1.0s p75
62.7% good ▲ fleet 58.7%
FCP diagnostic 1.9s p75
72.7% good ▼ fleet 76.6%
Where Nuxt loses ground: CLS — 69.3% of sites pass, against 87.8% across the fleet. The fingerprint below shows which habits move that number.

framework standings

#1 htmx 79.8% #2 Alpine 79.4% #3 React 76.1% #4 jQuery 70.4% #5 Svelte 67.3% #6 Vue 63.6% #7 Remix 58.7% #8 Gatsby 48.6% #9 Nuxt 48.1% #10 Next.js 46.5% #11 Angular 37.4%
All frameworks →

210,902 crawled sites (196,263 with Chrome field data), representing millions of real page loads, October 2026 edition. How we measured.