1
At a glance the headline numbers for Search impact
Performance impact by search provider.
—
Items
No data this edition
—
Sample
—
Best INP
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first
| # | Provider | INP p75 | Passing | Sites |
|---|
No data above the minimum sample threshold this edition.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often
ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
Algolia 0.1% 10 133ms
Doofinder 0.1% 11 183ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Doofinder 0.1%
632.7s
88183ms
1000.02
502.4s
251.8s
Algolia 0.1%
702.5s
100133ms
800.01
702.1s
561.2s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites
One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Maps (4) → Analytics (20) → CMS (17) → Video (7) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.