Tag managers impact React sites

Tag managers ranked by their performance impact.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes · React sites only
Metric LCP INP CLS
React Scoped to 9,570 sites out of 210,902 analyzed (frameworks) Compare with all sites →
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Tag managers impact

Tag managers ranked by their performance impact.

3
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
3,828
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
124ms
Best INP (p75)
Segment
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# Provider INP p75 Passing Sites
1 Segment 124ms 93.1%
70
2 Matomo Tag Manager 130ms 95.5%
173
3 Google Tag Manager 140ms 91.0%
3,585
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often

ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
Adobe Launch/DTM 0.1% 7 100% 108ms
Matomo Tag Manager 1.8% 173 96% 130ms
Segment 0.7% 70 93% 124ms
Google Tag Manager 37.5% 3,585 91% 140ms
Piwik PRO Tag Manager 0.1% 7 75% 168ms
Tealium iQ 0.3% 27 68% 210ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

96% of Matomo Tag Manager sites pass INP. Google Tag Manager trails 5 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Google Tag Manager 37.5%
752.5s
91140ms
890.02
702.0s
551.4s
Matomo Tag Manager 1.8%
732.6s
96130ms
900.01
532.2s
331.6s
Segment 0.7%
842.0s
93124ms
920.00
841.3s
81742ms
Tealium iQ 0.3%
802.1s
68210ms
840.04
761.8s
56890ms
Adobe Launch/DTM 0.1%
1002.0s
100108ms
670.09
1001.3s
100671ms
Piwik PRO Tag Manager 0.1%
602.5s
75168ms
1000.00
602.0s
60978ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Matomo Tag Manager leads on INP: 96% of its sites pass. Google Tag Manager trails at 91%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Video (7) → Push notifications (5) → Analytics (20) → Ad networks (9) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured