LCP resource discovery on React sites

HTML markup, CSS background-image, <link rel="preload">, JavaScript, or HTTP Link header: how the browser finds the LCP element and how much load delay each path adds.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes · React sites only
React Scoped to 9,570 sites out of 210,902 analyzed (frameworks) Compare with all sites →

On 84.0% of React sites, the browser finds the LCP element straight in the HTML. 13.7% hide it in a CSS stylesheet, 1.8% declare it with <link rel="preload">, and 0.4% inject it with JavaScript. Sites with the LCP element in HTML have a good LCP on 88% of sites (1.3s median), against 67% for CSS discovery (2.0s) and 82% for JavaScript discovery (1.9s). Preloading cuts median resource load delay to 207 ms, the lowest of any discovery path.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React: 9,570 crawled sites · 5,488 with phone field data · 9,390 sites with LCP resource discoveryBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
1

LCP pass rate

Sites with HTML discovery have a good LCP on 88% of React sites, <link rel="preload"> at 75%, CSS discovery at 67%, and JavaScript discovery at 82%. Why does <link rel="preload"> (75%) trail plain HTML discovery (88%) when preload is meant to speed up loading? Because six in ten preload sites use it on a CSS background-image on slower sites. On those background images, preload lifts good LCP from 67% to 75%.

SitesGood, needs improvement, poor LCPMedian
All React sites5,48884%1.4s
HTML document 84.0%4,50288%1.3s
JavaScript injection 0.4%2282%1.9s
<link rel="preload"> 1.8%10475%1.9s
CSS background-image 13.7%75167%2.0s
HTTP Link header 0.1%425%2.7s
GoodNeeds improvementPoorSites: with Chrome field data
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React: 9,570 crawled sites · 5,488 with phone field data · 9,390 sites with LCP resource discoveryBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

LCP resource discovery usage

On React, 84.0% of sites put their LCP element in the initial HTML markup. 13.7% (1,287 sites) put the LCP image inside a CSS background-image rule. Explicit <link rel="preload"> tags appear on 1.8% of React sites (168 sites), JavaScript injection on 0.4% (39 sites), and HTTP Link headers on 0.1% (5 sites).

HTML document 84.0% CSS background-image 13.7%
HTML document 84.0% CSS background-image 13.7% <link rel="preload"> 1.8% JavaScript injection 0.4% HTTP Link header 0.1%
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React: 9,570 crawled sites · 5,488 with phone field data · 9,390 sites with LCP resource discoveryBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

LCP phase breakdown by discovery path

How the browser discovers the LCP asset directly sets its resource load delay: <link rel="preload"> starts the download after a median 207 ms, HTML discovery after 437 ms, CSS discovery after 444 ms, JavaScript discovery after 327 ms. When a hero image lives in CSS, Chrome must download and parse the stylesheet and match the selector against the DOM before it sees the image URL. That adds 7 ms of load delay over HTML discovery.

Median LCP phase breakdown (Chrome field p75) Load delay Median LCP
React sites with LCP resource discovery 4,084499 ms433 ms433 mslab 440 ms1.4s
<link rel="preload"> 88991 ms207 mslab 216 ms1.8s
HTML document 3,375459 ms437 ms437 mslab 446 ms1.3s
CSS background-image 599894 ms444 ms444 mslab 432 ms2.0s
TTFB Resource load delay Resource load time Element render delay
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React: 9,570 crawled sites · 5,488 with phone field data · 9,390 sites with LCP resource discoveryBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

LCP discovery path by element type

More than half of all <link rel="preload"> sites (83 of 168) preload a CSS background-image rather than an <img> tag. Preloading cuts the background image's field load delay from 444 ms to 206 ms. That lifts LCP from 67% to 70%. Among standard <img> LCP elements, HTML discovery covers 5,573 sites (88% good, 438 ms load delay), <link rel="preload"> covers 79 sites (79% good, 199 ms delay), and JavaScript injection covers 35 sites (81% good, 327 ms delay).

Discovery path <img> element CSS background-image Text block <video> element
HTML document
88% 438 ms delay 5,573 sites
few sites
86% 434 ms delay 2,128 sites
82% 397 ms delay 190 sites
CSS background-image few sites
67% 444 ms delay 1,287 sites
few sites few sites
<link rel="preload">
79% 199 ms delay 79 sites
70% 206 ms delay 83 sites
few sites few sites
JavaScript injection
81% 327 ms delay 35 sites
few sites few sites few sites
HTTP Link header few sites few sites few sites few sites
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React: 9,570 crawled sites · 5,488 with phone field data · 9,390 sites with LCP resource discoveryBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

LCP resource discovery per platform

Wix discovers the LCP element in HTML on 99% of its sites and in CSS on 1%, and 94% of Wix sites have a good LCP. WordPress discovers the LCP element in HTML on 56% of its sites and in CSS on 37%, and 63% of WordPress sites have a good LCP.

PlatformLCP resource discovery on its sitesGood LCP
React sites with LCP resource discovery 9,390 sitesHTML document 84%CSS background-image 14%84%
Wix 5,791 sitesHTML document 99%94%
WordPress 2,219 sitesHTML document 56%CSS background-image 37%63%
HTML document CSS background-image <link rel="preload"> JavaScript injection HTTP Link header
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React: 9,570 crawled sites · 5,488 with phone field data · 9,390 sites with LCP resource discoveryBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
6

LCP discovery path or the platform

Does the platform explain the discovery gap?

On WordPress, 65% of sites with HTML discovery have a good LCP, against 58% of WordPress sites whose LCP image sits in CSS.

How much time early discovery saves

Resource load delay is the gap between Time to First Byte (when the HTML arrives) and the moment the browser starts downloading the LCP resource. When the LCP image is a standard <img> in the HTML, Chrome's preload scanner finds it at a 437 ms median load delay. When the image sits in an external stylesheet as a background-image, load delay jumps to 444 ms. The browser has to download the CSS, build the CSSOM, and match selectors to the DOM before it sees the image URL. A <link rel="preload" as="image"> tag in the <head> lets the preload scanner start the image download alongside the stylesheet. That cuts the CSS background image's load delay from 444 ms to 206 ms.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React: 9,570 crawled sites · 5,488 with phone field data · 9,390 sites with LCP resource discoveryBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
7

Understanding LCP resource discovery

Put the LCP image in the initial HTML as an <img> (or <picture>) element with fetchpriority="high". Do not hide hero images in CSS background-image rules or render them from client-side JavaScript. Across this dataset, 13.7% of sites put their LCP image in CSS, which adds 7 ms of resource load delay and drops good LCP from 88% to 67%. If a theme or page builder locks the hero into a CSS background-image, add <link rel="preload" as="image" fetchpriority="high"> in the <head> or send a Link: rel=preload HTTP header. The browser can then start downloading the image before the stylesheet arrives.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React: 9,570 crawled sites · 5,488 with phone field data · 9,390 sites with LCP resource discoveryBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals LCP image size → LCP element type → LCP origin → LCP image format → By Arjen Karel · 9,570 crawled React sites (5,488 with phone Chrome field data, 9,390 sites with LCP resource discovery, October 2026) · How we measured