TTFB distribution WordPress sites
How TTFB is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for TTFB distribution
How TTFB is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
35.8%
of sites good on TTFB
1.1s
Typical site
2.6s
Worst 10% of sites
35.8% of sites good on TTFB. The typical site's TTFB is 1.1s. The worst 10% are above 2.6s.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The TTFB distribution site count at each TTFB, from good to poor
0 435 870 1,304 1,739
p50 = 1.1s
p75 = 1.7s
p90 = 2.6s
p99 = 5.2s
0–150 150–300 300–450 450–600 600–750 750–900 900–1050 1050–1200 1200–1350 1350–1500 1500–1650 1650–1800 1800–1950 1950–2100 2100–2250 2250–2400 2400+
Good (≤800ms) Needs improvement Poor (>1.8s) Percentile markers Total: 14,727 sites
35.8% of sites are good on TTFB (at or under 800ms). The typical site is at 1.1s, and 75% of sites stay under 1.7s. Only 64.2% miss good TTFB. The slowest 10% are above 2.6s, and the slowest 1% are above 5.2s.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
The TTFB pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor
Good Needs Improvement Poor
35.8% of sites are good on TTFB. 42.0% are in the needs improvement band, between 800ms and 1.8s. 22.3% are poor, above 1.8s. Misses split about evenly between the two.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals FCP → LCP → CLS → INP → 203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.