Third-party provider categories on WordPress and the Core Web Vitals

Sites with personalization third-party technology categories pass all three Core Web Vitals most often: 63%, against 60% of all WordPress sites. The biggest gap is CLS, 79% against 78%.

Sites with cdp third-party technology categories have a good LCP most often: 83%, against 76% of all WordPress sites. Sites with ecommerce runtime third-party categories have it least often, at 60%.

Sites with ecommerce runtime third-party technology categories have a good INP most often: 100%, against 100% of all WordPress sites. Sites with push notifications third-party categories have it least often, at 98%.

Sites with scheduling third-party technology categories have a good CLS most often: 83%, against 78% of all WordPress sites. Sites with push notifications third-party categories have it least often, at 65%.

CMS is the most used: 99.9% of WordPress sites. Personalization is 6.2% of WordPress sites.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between cdp and ecommerce runtime sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 735 ms median for cdp against 1400 ms for ecommerce runtime. Overall median field LCP is 1.6s for cdp (TTFB 735 ms, load delay 307 ms, load duration 147 ms, render delay 201 ms) versus 2.2s for ecommerce runtime.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between cdp and ecommerce runtime sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 735 ms median for cdp against 1400 ms for ecommerce runtime. Overall median field LCP is 1.6s for cdp (TTFB 735 ms, load delay 307 ms, load duration 147 ms, render delay 201 ms) versus 2.2s for ecommerce runtime.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between cdp and ecommerce runtime sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 735 ms median for cdp against 1400 ms for ecommerce runtime. Overall median field LCP is 1.6s for cdp (TTFB 735 ms, load delay 307 ms, load duration 147 ms, render delay 201 ms) versus 2.2s for ecommerce runtime.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between cdp and ecommerce runtime sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 735 ms median for cdp against 1400 ms for ecommerce runtime. Overall median field LCP is 1.6s for cdp (TTFB 735 ms, load delay 307 ms, load duration 147 ms, render delay 201 ms) versus 2.2s for ecommerce runtime.

On jQuery, 100% of sites use framework third-party technology categories, and 60% of jQuery sites pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 60% of all sites. On Vue, 100% of sites use framework, and 57% of Vue sites pass all three.

On jQuery, 100% of sites use framework third-party technology categories, and 75% of jQuery sites have a good LCP, against 76% of all sites. On Vue, 100% of sites use framework, and 75% of Vue sites have a good LCP.

On jQuery, 100% of sites use framework third-party technology categories, and 100% of jQuery sites have a good INP, against 100% of all sites. On Vue, 100% of sites use framework, and 99% of Vue sites have a good INP.

On jQuery, 100% of sites use framework third-party technology categories, and 77% of jQuery sites have a good CLS, against 78% of all sites. On Vue, 100% of sites use framework, and 75% of Vue sites have a good CLS.

FrameworkThird-party technology categories on its sitesPass all three

All WordPress sites 63,295 sitesCMS Platform Signatures 100%JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 97%Analytics & Telemetry 61%Web Font Services 59%Content Delivery Networks (CDN) 58%Tag Managers 55%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 43%Consent Management (CMP) 36%Bot Detection & Security (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile) 35%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 25%Performance & Caching Plugins 23%Ecommerce Platform Runtimes 21%Embedded Maps 17%A/B Testing & Experimentation 12%Image CDNs 11%60%

Alpine 380 sitesCMS Platform Signatures 100%JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 92%Content Delivery Networks (CDN) 85%Analytics & Telemetry 85%Tag Managers 80%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 65%Web Font Services 56%Consent Management (CMP) 54%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 49%Bot Detection & Security (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile) 46%Embedded Maps 34%Performance & Caching Plugins 29%Image CDNs 27%Personalization Engines 26%Ecommerce Platform Runtimes 22%Session Recording & Heatmaps 20%Display Ad Networks 13%A/B Testing & Experimentation 12%Real User Monitoring (RUM) 11%Email & CRM Popups 11%69%

jQuery 60,314 sitesJavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 100%CMS Platform Signatures 100%Analytics & Telemetry 62%Web Font Services 60%Content Delivery Networks (CDN) 59%Tag Managers 55%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 44%Consent Management (CMP) 36%Bot Detection & Security (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile) 35%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 26%Performance & Caching Plugins 24%Ecommerce Platform Runtimes 22%Embedded Maps 17%A/B Testing & Experimentation 13%Image CDNs 12%60%

Vue 4,844 sitesJavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 100%CMS Platform Signatures 100%Consent Management (CMP) 84%Analytics & Telemetry 66%Content Delivery Networks (CDN) 50%Tag Managers 37%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 32%Web Font Services 28%Performance & Caching Plugins 28%Ecommerce Platform Runtimes 22%Bot Detection & Security (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile) 18%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 15%57%

React 2,233 sitesCMS Platform Signatures 100%JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 97%Content Delivery Networks (CDN) 68%Analytics & Telemetry 67%Tag Managers 62%Web Font Services 61%Ecommerce Platform Runtimes 47%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 47%Consent Management (CMP) 41%Bot Detection & Security (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile) 39%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 32%Performance & Caching Plugins 25%Embedded Maps 18%Image CDNs 11%Display Ad Networks 11%50%

CMS Platform Signatures JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries Analytics & Telemetry Web Font Services Content Delivery Networks (CDN) Tag Managers Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) Consent Management (CMP) Bot Detection & Security (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile) Marketing & Retargeting Pixels Performance & Caching Plugins Ecommerce Platform Runtimes Embedded Maps A/B Testing & Experimentation Image CDNs Display Ad Networks Session Recording & Heatmaps Personalization Engines Email & CRM Popups Real User Monitoring (RUM) Live Chat & Support Widgets Customer Review Widgets Customer Data Platforms (CDP) Booking & Scheduling Widgets Push notifications

Does the framework explain the third-party technology categories difference?

On jQuery, 62% of sites with personalization third-party technology categories pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 60% of jQuery sites with CMS. Within jQuery, sites with personalization and CMS pass all three about equally often. On Vue, 49% of sites with personalization third-party technology categories pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 57% of Vue sites with CMS. Within Vue, sites with personalization and CMS pass all three about equally often.

On jQuery, 82% of sites with cdp third-party technology categories have a good LCP, against 75% of jQuery sites with CMS. Within jQuery, sites with cdp and CMS have a good LCP about equally often. On Vue, 75% of sites with CMS third-party technology categories have a good LCP, against 75% of Vue sites with framework. Within Vue, sites with CMS and framework have a good LCP about equally often.

On jQuery, 100% of sites with ecommerce runtime third-party technology categories have a good INP, against 100% of jQuery sites with CMS. Within jQuery, sites with ecommerce runtime and CMS have a good INP about equally often. On Vue, 100% of sites with ecommerce runtime third-party technology categories have a good INP, against 99% of Vue sites with CMS. Within Vue, sites with ecommerce runtime and CMS have a good INP about equally often.

On jQuery, 83% of sites with scheduling third-party technology categories have a good CLS, against 77% of jQuery sites with CMS. Within jQuery, sites with scheduling and CMS have a good CLS about equally often. On Vue, 74% of sites with CMS third-party technology categories have a good CLS, against 75% of Vue sites with framework. Within Vue, sites with CMS and framework have a good CLS about equally often.