CDN impact React sites

Time to first byte by CDN provider, measured in real-user Chrome data.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes · React sites only
Metric TTFB LCP FCP
React Scoped to 9,570 sites out of 210,902 analyzed (frameworks) Compare with all sites →
1

At a glance the headline numbers for CDN impact

Time to first byte by CDN provider, measured in real-user Chrome data.

11
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
26,752
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
692ms
Best TTFB (p75)
Google Cloud CDN
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by TTFB at p75, fastest first

# Provider TTFB p75 Passing Sites
1 Google Cloud CDN 692ms 79.4%
6,456
2 CloudFront 798ms 75.1%
7,234
3 Fastly 877ms 72.3%
7,837
4 Vercel Edge 975ms 65.6%
93
5 Netlify Edge 1.2s 8.2%
79
6 Cloudflare 1.3s 57.9%
3,558
7 Akamai 1.5s 46.2%
223
8 jsDelivr 1.7s 46.8%
281
9 Bunny CDN 1.7s 43.0%
366
10 cdnjs 1.8s 43.4%
386
11 unpkg 1.9s 39.2%
239
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing TTFB per CDN which group passes the TTFB most often

CDNSitesPassing TTFBp75
Google Cloud CDN 67.5% 6,456 79% 692ms
CloudFront 75.6% 7,234 75% 798ms
Imperva/Incapsula 0.2% 15 73% 882ms
Fastly 81.9% 7,837 72% 877ms
Vercel Edge 1% 93 66% 975ms
Cloudflare 37.2% 3,558 58% 1.3s
Azure CDN 0.3% 32 48% 985ms
jsDelivr 2.9% 281 47% 1.7s
Akamai 2.3% 223 46% 1.5s
cdnjs 4% 386 43% 1.8s
Bunny CDN 3.8% 366 43% 1.7s
unpkg 2.5% 239 39% 1.9s
KeyCDN 0.3% 24 30% 2.4s
Netlify Edge 0.8% 79 1.2s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good TTFB (800ms at p75) · one value per site

79% of Google Cloud CDN sites pass TTFB. Unpkg trails 40 points behind, leaving 61% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Fastly 81.9%
881.9s
96102ms
930.01
851.4s
72877ms
CloudFront 75.6%
891.8s
9699ms
950.01
881.3s
75798ms
Google Cloud CDN 67.5%
921.7s
9695ms
970.00
911.1s
79692ms
Cloudflare 37.2%
782.4s
93120ms
870.03
731.9s
581.3s
cdnjs 4%
633.0s
96129ms
790.09
572.4s
431.8s
Bunny CDN 3.8%
682.8s
93121ms
810.09
622.2s
431.7s
jsDelivr 2.9%
712.7s
86140ms
730.12
632.1s
471.7s
unpkg 2.5%
563.0s
89133ms
750.10
522.5s
391.9s
Akamai 2.3%
762.5s
91136ms
840.05
681.9s
461.5s
Vercel Edge 1%
782.4s
91126ms
790.07
731.9s
66975ms
Netlify Edge 0.8%
842.4s
28726ms
240.32
841.6s
81.2s
Azure CDN 0.3%
872.1s
93125ms
810.04
811.7s
48985ms
KeyCDN 0.3%
583.5s
100145ms
670.14
422.8s
302.4s
Imperva/Incapsula 0.2%
802.3s
100115ms
870.02
871.7s
73882ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per CDN, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Google Cloud CDN leads on TTFB: 79% of its sites pass. unpkg trails at 39%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Marketing pixels (10) → Bot detection (8) → Forms (4) → Personalization (6) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured