Tag managers impact React sites

Tag managers ranked by their performance impact.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes · React sites only
Metric LCP INP CLS
React Scoped to 9,570 sites out of 210,902 analyzed (frameworks) Compare with all sites →
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Tag managers impact

Tag managers ranked by their performance impact.

3
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
3,828
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
100ms
Best INP (p75)
Segment
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# Provider INP p75 Passing Sites
1 Segment 100ms 95.7%
70
2 Google Tag Manager 117ms 94.4%
3,585
3 Matomo Tag Manager 119ms 98.0%
173
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often

ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
Adobe Launch/DTM 0.1% 7 100% 97ms
Matomo Tag Manager 1.8% 173 98% 119ms
Segment 0.7% 70 96% 100ms
Google Tag Manager 37.5% 3,585 94% 117ms
Tealium iQ 0.3% 27 89% 183ms
Piwik PRO Tag Manager 0.1% 7 83% 105ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

No provider stands out: pass rates sit between 94% and 98%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Google Tag Manager 37.5%
762.4s
94117ms
890.03
711.9s
541.4s
Matomo Tag Manager 1.8%
732.6s
98119ms
880.04
562.1s
341.6s
Segment 0.7%
921.7s
96100ms
860.04
891.2s
80703ms
Tealium iQ 0.3%
822.0s
89183ms
890.05
781.7s
63839ms
Adobe Launch/DTM 0.1%
861.9s
10097ms
710.10
861.2s
86667ms
Piwik PRO Tag Manager 0.1%
862.1s
83105ms
710.08
861.7s
71876ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Matomo Tag Manager leads on INP: 98% of its sites pass. Google Tag Manager trails at 94%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Video (7) → Push notifications (5) → Analytics (20) → Ad networks (9) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured