The State of Web Vitals

FCP distribution React sites

How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes · React sites only
React Scoped to 9,570 sites out of 210,902 analyzed (frameworks) Compare with all sites →
1

At a glance the headline numbers for FCP distribution

How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.

81.2%
of sites good on FCP
950ms
Typical site
2.4s
Worst 10% of sites

81.2% of sites good on FCP. The typical site's FCP is 950ms. The worst 10% are above 2.4s.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The FCP distribution site count at each FCP, from good to poor

0 498 995 1,493 1,990
0–200ms0 sites0% of all sites
200–400ms109 sites1.2% of all sites
400–600ms1,349 sites14.8% of all sites
600–800ms1,990 sites21.8% of all sites
800–1000ms1,384 sites15.2% of all sites
1000–1200ms916 sites10% of all sites
1200–1400ms671 sites7.4% of all sites
1400–1600ms593 sites6.5% of all sites
1600–1800ms392 sites4.3% of all sites
1800–2000ms360 sites3.9% of all sites
2000–2200ms264 sites2.9% of all sites
2200–2400ms228 sites2.5% of all sites
2400–2600ms174 sites1.9% of all sites
2600–2800ms124 sites1.4% of all sites
2800–3000ms108 sites1.2% of all sites
3000–3200ms84 sites0.9% of all sites
3200ms and up377 sites4.1% of all sites
p50 = 950ms
p75 = 1.5s
p90 = 2.4s
p99 = 4.8s
0–200 200–400 400–600 600–800 800–1000 1000–1200 1200–1400 1400–1600 1600–1800 1800–2000 2000–2200 2200–2400 2400–2600 2600–2800 2800–3000 3000–3200 3200+
Good (≤1.8s) Needs improvement Poor (>3s) Percentile markers Total: 9,123 sites

Most sites are good on FCP. 81.2% sit at or under 1.8s. The typical site is at 950ms, and 75% of sites stay under 1.5s. Only 18.8% miss good FCP. The slowest 10% are above 2.4s, and the slowest 1% are above 4.8s.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

The FCP pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor

FCP
81.2%
13.8%
5%
Good Needs Improvement Poor

81.2% of sites are good on FCP. 13.8% are in the needs improvement band, between 1.8s and 3s. 5.0% are poor, above 3s. A miss is usually needs improvement, not poor.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → TTFB → INP → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured