INP distribution React sites
How INP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for INP distribution
How INP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
98.9%
of sites pass INP
48ms
Typical site
93ms
Worst 10% of sites
98.9% of sites pass INP. The typical site's INP is 48ms. The worst 10% are above 93ms.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The INP distribution site count at each INP, from good to poor
0 202 404 606 808
p50 = 48ms
p75 = 66ms
p90 = 93ms
p99 = 206ms
0–25 25–50 50–75 75–100 100–125 125–150 150–175 175–200 200–225 225–250 250–275 275–300 300–325 325–350 350–375 375–400 400+
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Percentile markers Total: 1,658 sites
Most sites pass INP. 98.9% sit at or under 200ms. The typical site is at 48ms, and 75% of sites stay under 66ms. Only 1.1% fail INP. The slowest 10% are above 93ms, and the slowest 1% are above 206ms.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
The INP pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor
Good Needs Improvement Poor
98.9% of sites pass INP. 0.8% are in the needs improvement band, between 200ms and 500ms. 0.2% are poor, above 500ms. A miss is usually needs improvement, not poor.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → FCP → TTFB → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.