The State of Web Vitals

FCP distribution React sites

How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes · React sites only
React Scoped to 9,570 sites out of 210,902 analyzed (frameworks) Compare with all sites →
1

At a glance the headline numbers for FCP distribution

How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.

76.5%
of sites good on FCP
1.0s
Typical site
2.7s
Worst 10% of sites

76.5% of sites good on FCP. The typical site's FCP is 1.0s. The worst 10% are above 2.7s.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The FCP distribution site count at each FCP, from good to poor

0 99 198 297 396
0–200ms0 sites0% of all sites
200–400ms103 sites5.2% of all sites
400–600ms396 sites20% of all sites
600–800ms275 sites13.9% of all sites
800–1000ms203 sites10.3% of all sites
1000–1200ms174 sites8.8% of all sites
1200–1400ms134 sites6.8% of all sites
1400–1600ms130 sites6.6% of all sites
1600–1800ms100 sites5.1% of all sites
1800–2000ms84 sites4.2% of all sites
2000–2200ms72 sites3.6% of all sites
2200–2400ms49 sites2.5% of all sites
2400–2600ms51 sites2.6% of all sites
2600–2800ms37 sites1.9% of all sites
2800–3000ms23 sites1.2% of all sites
3000–3200ms29 sites1.5% of all sites
3200ms and up120 sites6.1% of all sites
p50 = 1s
p75 = 1.7s
p90 = 2.7s
p99 = 4.6s
0–200 200–400 400–600 600–800 800–1000 1000–1200 1200–1400 1400–1600 1600–1800 1800–2000 2000–2200 2200–2400 2400–2600 2600–2800 2800–3000 3000–3200 3200+
Good (≤1.8s) Needs improvement Poor (>3s) Percentile markers Total: 1,980 sites

Most sites are good on FCP. 76.5% sit at or under 1.8s. The typical site is at 1.0s, and 75% of sites stay under 1.7s. Only 23.5% miss good FCP. The slowest 10% are above 2.7s, and the slowest 1% are above 4.6s.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

The FCP pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor

FCP
76.5%
16%
7.5%
Good Needs Improvement Poor

76.5% of sites are good on FCP. 16.0% are in the needs improvement band, between 1.8s and 3s. 7.5% are poor, above 3s. A miss is usually needs improvement, not poor.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → TTFB → INP → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured