LCP distribution React sites
How LCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for LCP distribution
How LCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
78.9%
of sites pass LCP
1.5s
Typical site
3.3s
Worst 10% of sites
78.9% of sites pass LCP. The typical site's LCP is 1.5s. The worst 10% are above 3.3s.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The LCP distribution site count at each LCP, from good to poor
0 73 145 218 290
p50 = 1.5s
p75 = 2.3s
p90 = 3.3s
p99 = 5.7s
0–250 250–500 500–750 750–1000 1000–1250 1250–1500 1500–1750 1750–2000 2000–2250 2250–2500 2500–2750 2750–3000 3000–3250 3250–3500 3500–3750 3750–4000 4000+
Good (≤2.5s) Needs improvement Poor (>4s) Percentile markers Total: 1,945 sites
Most sites pass LCP. 78.9% sit at or under 2.5s. The typical site is at 1.5s, and 75% of sites stay under 2.3s. Only 21.1% fail LCP. The slowest 10% are above 3.3s, and the slowest 1% are above 5.7s.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
The LCP pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor
Good Needs Improvement Poor
78.9% of sites pass LCP. 15.7% are in the needs improvement band, between 2.5s and 4s. 5.4% are poor, above 4s. A miss is usually needs improvement, not poor.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals TTFB → FCP → CLS → INP → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.