Tag managers on React sites

Sites with Google Tag Manager tag managers have a good INP most often: 99%, against 99% of all React sites.

Sites with Google Tag Manager tag managers have a good LCP most often: 73%, against 79% of all React sites.

Google Tag Manager is the most used: 95.0% of React sites.

Wix sets the tag managers to Google Tag Manager on 100% of its sites, and 100% of Wix sites have a good INP, against 99% of all sites.

Wix sets the tag managers to Google Tag Manager on 100% of its sites, and 92% of Wix sites have a good LCP, against 79% of all sites.

PlatformTag managers on its sitesGood INP

React sites with tag managers 3,775 sitesGoogle Tag Manager (GTM) 95%99%

Wix 1,589 sitesGoogle Tag Manager (GTM) 100%100%

WordPress 1,450 sitesGoogle Tag Manager (GTM) 91%100%

Google Tag Manager (GTM) Matomo Tag Manager Segment (analytics.js) Tealium iQ Adobe Experience Platform Launch

Does the platform explain the tag managers difference?

On WordPress, 100% of sites with Google Tag Manager tag managers have a good INP, against 100% of WordPress sites with Matomo Tag Manager. Within WordPress, sites with Google Tag Manager and Matomo Tag Manager have a good INP about equally often.

On WordPress, 62% of sites with Google Tag Manager tag managers have a good LCP, against 78% of WordPress sites with Matomo Tag Manager. Within WordPress, sites with Google Tag Manager have a good LCP less often.

How container triggers execute third-party listeners on click and keypress

A tag manager's own loader is small, but click and form-submit triggers run synchronously inside user interaction frames. Among the 3,775 sites with a tag manager, 95.0% use Google Tag Manager (99% good INP) and 4.6% use Matomo Tag Manager (100% good INP), whereas sites running heavier enterprise containers such as Tealium iQ (0.7%, 100% good INP), Adobe Launch (0.2%, 100%), and Segment (1.9%, 75%) record lower good INP pass rates.