INP distribution Wix sites
How INP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for INP distribution
How INP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
97.2%
of sites pass INP
74ms
Typical site
113ms
Worst 10% of sites
97.2% of sites pass INP. The typical site's INP is 74ms. The worst 10% are above 113ms.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix sites (5,623) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The INP distribution site count at each INP, from good to poor
0 451 903 1,354 1,805
p50 = 74ms
p75 = 88ms
p90 = 113ms
p99 = 293ms
0–25 25–50 50–75 75–100 100–125 125–150 150–175 175–200 200–225 225–250 250–275 275–300 300–325 325–350 350–375 375–400 400+
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Percentile markers Total: 3,966 sites
Most sites pass INP. 97.2% sit at or under 200ms. The typical site is at 74ms, and 75% of sites stay under 88ms. Only 2.8% fail INP. The slowest 10% are above 113ms, and the slowest 1% are above 293ms.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix sites (5,623) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
The INP pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor
Good Needs Improvement Poor
97.2% of sites pass INP. 2.5% are in the needs improvement band, between 200ms and 500ms. 0.3% are poor, above 500ms. A miss is usually needs improvement, not poor.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix sites (5,623) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → FCP → TTFB → 203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.