Third-party provider categories on Wix sites
Frameworks (99.9%), CDNs (99.9%), analytics (30.8%), tag managers (27.3%), font services (5.2%), video embeds (17.6%), and ad networks (8.6%) across 5,621 sites.
7.3% of Wix sites use A/B testing third-party technology categories, and 90% of those sites pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 90% of all Wix sites.
7.3% of Wix sites use A/B testing third-party technology categories, and 94% of those sites have a good LCP, against 94% of all Wix sites.
30.8% of Wix sites use analytics third-party technology categories, and 98% of those sites have a good INP, against 97% of all Wix sites.
2.0% of Wix sites use image CDN third-party technology categories, and 100% of those sites have a good CLS, against 98% of all Wix sites.
Core Web Vitals pass rate
Sites with A/B testing third-party technology categories pass all three Core Web Vitals most often: 90%, against 90% of all Wix sites.
Sites with A/B testing third-party technology categories have a good LCP most often: 94%, against 94% of all Wix sites. Sites with image CDN third-party categories have it least often, at 83%.
Sites with analytics third-party technology categories have a good INP most often: 98%, against 97% of all Wix sites. Sites with font service third-party categories have it least often, at 96%.
Sites with image CDN third-party technology categories have a good CLS most often: 100%, against 98% of all Wix sites. Sites with analytics third-party categories have it least often, at 98%.
Third-party technology categories usage
Framework is the most used: 99.9% of Wix sites. A/B testing is 7.3% of Wix sites.
How third-party categories affect the four LCP phases
Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between A/B testing and image CDN sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 428 ms median for A/B testing against 586 ms for image CDN. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for A/B testing (TTFB 428 ms, load delay 430 ms, load duration 128 ms, render delay 155 ms) versus 1.5s for image CDN.
Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between A/B testing and image CDN sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 428 ms median for A/B testing against 586 ms for image CDN. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for A/B testing (TTFB 428 ms, load delay 430 ms, load duration 128 ms, render delay 155 ms) versus 1.5s for image CDN.
Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between A/B testing and image CDN sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 428 ms median for A/B testing against 586 ms for image CDN. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for A/B testing (TTFB 428 ms, load delay 430 ms, load duration 128 ms, render delay 155 ms) versus 1.5s for image CDN.
Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between A/B testing and image CDN sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 428 ms median for A/B testing against 586 ms for image CDN. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for A/B testing (TTFB 428 ms, load delay 430 ms, load duration 128 ms, render delay 155 ms) versus 1.5s for image CDN.
Third-party technology categories per framework
On React, 100% of sites use CDN third-party technology categories, and 90% of React sites pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 90% of all sites.
On React, 100% of sites use CDN third-party technology categories, and 94% of React sites have a good LCP, against 94% of all sites.
On React, 100% of sites use CDN third-party technology categories, and 97% of React sites have a good INP, against 97% of all sites.
On React, 100% of sites use CDN third-party technology categories, and 98% of React sites have a good CLS, against 98% of all sites.
Third-party technology categories or the framework
Does the framework explain the third-party technology categories difference?
On React, 90% of sites with A/B testing third-party technology categories pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 90% of React sites with framework. Within React, sites with A/B testing and framework pass all three about equally often.
On React, 94% of sites with A/B testing third-party technology categories have a good LCP, against 94% of React sites with framework. Within React, sites with A/B testing and framework have a good LCP about equally often.
On React, 98% of sites with analytics third-party technology categories have a good INP, against 97% of React sites with framework. Within React, sites with analytics and framework have a good INP about equally often.
On React, 100% of sites with image CDN third-party technology categories have a good CLS, against 98% of React sites with framework. Within React, sites with image CDN and framework have a good CLS about equally often.
By Arjen Karel · 5,621 crawled Wix sites (5,333 with all devices Chrome field data, October 2026). How we measured.