Stylesheet loading and placement on Wix sites

0.2% of audited sites (10) use non-blocking stylesheets in <head> and reach 90% good LCP (1.5s median), whereas the 1.5% placing <link rel="stylesheet"> tags inside <body> drop to 85% good LCP (1.5s median).

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes · Wix sites only
Wix Scoped to 5,623 sites out of 203,892 analyzed (cms) Compare with all sites →

100.0% of Wix sites use inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement, and 94% of those sites have a good LCP, against 94% of all Wix sites.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix: 5,621 crawled sites · 5,333 with all devices field dataBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
1

Core Web Vitals pass rate

Sites with inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement have a good LCP most often: 94%, against 94% of all Wix sites. Sites with render-blocking <head> stylesheets CSS loading have it least often, at 93%.

SitesGood, needs improvement, poor LCPMedian
All Wix sites5,33394%1.2s
Inline <style> blocks 100.0%5,33394%1.2s
Render-blocking in <head> 33.5%1,80193%1.2s
Non-blocking in <head> (preload / media) 0.2%1090%1.5s
Stylesheets inside <body> 1.5%8385%1.5s
GoodNeeds improvementPoorSites: with Chrome field data
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix: 5,621 crawled sites · 5,333 with all devices field dataBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Stylesheet loading and placement usage

Inline <style> blocks is the most used: 100.0% of Wix sites.

Sites using each option (sites can use more than one) 5,621 sites
Inline <style> blocks 100.0% Render-blocking in <head> 33.5%
Inline <style> blocks 100.0% Render-blocking in <head> 33.5% Stylesheets inside <body> 1.5% Non-blocking in <head> (preload / media) 0.2%
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix: 5,621 crawled sites · 5,333 with all devices field dataBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

LCP phase breakdown by stylesheet placement and loading mode

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between inline <style> blocks and render-blocking <head> stylesheets sits in resource load duration: 137 ms median for inline <style> blocks against 130 ms for render-blocking <head> stylesheets. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for inline <style> blocks (TTFB 419 ms, load delay 455 ms, load duration 137 ms, render delay 151 ms) versus 1.2s for render-blocking <head> stylesheets.

Median LCP phase breakdown (Chrome field p75) Load delay Median LCP
All Wix sites 3,945419 ms455 ms455 mslab 455 ms1.2s
Inline <style> blocks 3,945419 ms455 ms455 mslab 455 ms1.2s
Render-blocking in <head> 1,344417 ms459 ms459 mslab 459 ms1.2s
Stylesheets inside <body> 63476 ms576 ms190 ms158 ms576 mslab 576 ms1.4s
TTFB Resource load delay Resource load time Element render delay
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix: 5,621 crawled sites · 5,333 with all devices field dataBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Stylesheet loading and placement per framework

React sets the stylesheet loading and placement to inline <style> blocks on 100% of its sites, and 94% of React sites have a good LCP, against 94% of all sites.

FrameworkStylesheet loading and placement on its sitesGood LCP
All Wix sites 5,621 sitesInline <style> blocks 100%Render-blocking in <head> 34%94%
React 5,620 sitesInline <style> blocks 100%Render-blocking in <head> 34%94%
Inline <style> blocks Render-blocking in <head> Stylesheets inside <body> Non-blocking in <head> (preload / media)
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix: 5,621 crawled sites · 5,333 with all devices field dataBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Stylesheet loading or the framework

Does the framework explain the stylesheet loading and placement difference?

Almost every site with inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement is a React site, and almost every React site has inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement, so the data can't tell inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement and React apart.

Why <link rel="stylesheet"> inside <body> hurts LCP and triggers late style recalculation

Standard <link rel="stylesheet"> tags in <head> (33.5% of sites, 1,885) block first paint until downloaded (93% good LCP, 1.2s median), while inline <style> blocks (100.0%) reach 94% good LCP and non-blocking <head> stylesheets (0.2%) reach 90% good LCP (1.5s median). Scattering <link rel="stylesheet"> tags inside <body> (1.5% of sites, 87) forces late parser pauses and mid-render style passes, dropping good LCP to 85% (1.5s median).

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix: 5,621 crawled sites · 5,333 with all devices field dataBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
6

Understanding stylesheet loading and placement

Inline critical above-the-fold CSS in <head>, load non-critical stylesheets asynchronously in <head> via preload or print-media swap, and never output synchronous <link rel="stylesheet"> tags inside <body>. Across all audited sites, 0.2% use non-blocking <head> CSS (90% good LCP) while 1.5% place stylesheets in <body> (85% good LCP).

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · Wix: 5,621 crawled sites · 5,333 with all devices field dataBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CSS coverage (used vs unused) → DOM depth → Image loading attribute → Image dimensions set → By Arjen Karel · 5,621 crawled Wix sites (5,333 with all devices Chrome field data, October 2026) · How we measured