Stylesheet loading and placement on Wix sites
0.2% of audited sites (10) use non-blocking stylesheets in <head> and reach 90% good LCP (1.5s median), whereas the 1.5% placing <link rel="stylesheet"> tags inside <body> drop to 85% good LCP (1.5s median).
100.0% of Wix sites use inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement, and 94% of those sites have a good LCP, against 94% of all Wix sites.
100.0% of Wix sites use inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement, and 98% of those sites have a good CLS, against 98% of all Wix sites.
Core Web Vitals pass rate
Sites with inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement have a good LCP most often: 94%, against 94% of all Wix sites. Sites with render-blocking <head> stylesheets CSS loading have it least often, at 93%.
Sites with inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement have a good CLS most often: 98%, against 98% of all Wix sites. Sites with render-blocking <head> stylesheets CSS loading have it least often, at 97%.
Stylesheet loading and placement usage
Inline <style> blocks is the most used: 100.0% of Wix sites.
LCP phase breakdown by stylesheet placement and loading mode
Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between inline <style> blocks and render-blocking <head> stylesheets sits in resource load duration: 137 ms median for inline <style> blocks against 130 ms for render-blocking <head> stylesheets. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for inline <style> blocks (TTFB 419 ms, load delay 455 ms, load duration 137 ms, render delay 151 ms) versus 1.2s for render-blocking <head> stylesheets.
Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between inline <style> blocks and render-blocking <head> stylesheets sits in resource load duration: 137 ms median for inline <style> blocks against 130 ms for render-blocking <head> stylesheets. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for inline <style> blocks (TTFB 419 ms, load delay 455 ms, load duration 137 ms, render delay 151 ms) versus 1.2s for render-blocking <head> stylesheets.
Stylesheet loading and placement per framework
React sets the stylesheet loading and placement to inline <style> blocks on 100% of its sites, and 94% of React sites have a good LCP, against 94% of all sites.
React sets the stylesheet loading and placement to inline <style> blocks on 100% of its sites, and 98% of React sites have a good CLS, against 98% of all sites.
Stylesheet loading or the framework
Does the framework explain the stylesheet loading and placement difference?
Almost every site with inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement is a React site, and almost every React site has inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement, so the data can't tell inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement and React apart.
Almost every site with inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement is a React site, and almost every React site has inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement, so the data can't tell inline <style> blocks stylesheet loading and placement and React apart.
Why <link rel="stylesheet"> inside <body> hurts LCP and triggers late style recalculation
Standard <link rel="stylesheet"> tags in <head> (33.5% of sites, 1,885) block first paint until downloaded (93% good LCP, 1.2s median), while inline <style> blocks (100.0%) reach 94% good LCP and non-blocking <head> stylesheets (0.2%) reach 90% good LCP (1.5s median). Scattering <link rel="stylesheet"> tags inside <body> (1.5% of sites, 87) forces late parser pauses and mid-render style passes, dropping good LCP to 85% (1.5s median).
Understanding stylesheet loading and placement
Inline critical above-the-fold CSS in <head>, load non-critical stylesheets asynchronously in <head> via preload or print-media swap, and never output synchronous <link rel="stylesheet"> tags inside <body>. Across all audited sites, 0.2% use non-blocking <head> CSS (90% good LCP) while 1.5% place stylesheets in <body> (85% good LCP).
By Arjen Karel · 5,621 crawled Wix sites (5,333 with all devices Chrome field data, October 2026). How we measured.