Shopify cacheable resource share and the Core Web Vitals
The share of responses that carry cacheable headers.
60.7% of Shopify sites use 80%+ cacheable resources cacheable resource share, and 98% of those sites have a good LCP, against 97% of all Shopify sites.
LCP pass rate
Sites with 80%+ cacheable resources cacheable resource share have a good LCP most often: 98%, against 97% of all Shopify sites. Sites with 50% to 79% cacheable resources cacheable share have it least often, at 95%.
Cacheable resource share usage
80%+ cacheable resources is the most used: 60.7% of Shopify sites.
LCP phase breakdown by share of cacheable subresources
Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between 80%+ cacheable resources and 50% to 79% cacheable resources sits in resource load delay: 588 ms median for 80%+ cacheable resources against 680 ms for 50% to 79% cacheable resources. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for 80%+ cacheable resources (TTFB 308 ms, load delay 588 ms, load duration 161 ms, render delay 273 ms) versus 1.4s for 50% to 79% cacheable resources.
Cacheable resource share per framework
jQuery sets the cacheable resource share to 80%+ cacheable resources on 54% of its sites, and 95% of jQuery sites have a good LCP, against 97% of all sites.
Cacheable resource share or the framework
Does the framework explain the cacheable resource share difference?
On jQuery, 97% of sites with 80%+ cacheable resources cacheable resource share have a good LCP, against 94% of jQuery sites with 50% to 79% cacheable resources. Within jQuery, sites with 80%+ cacheable resources have a good LCP more often. On Vue, 97% of sites with 80%+ cacheable resources cacheable resource share have a good LCP, against 96% of Vue sites with 50% to 79% cacheable resources. Within Vue, sites with 80%+ cacheable resources and 50% to 79% cacheable resources have a good LCP about equally often.
By Arjen Karel · 8,246 crawled Shopify sites (3,818 with desktop Chrome field data, October 2026). How we measured.