Long Animation Frame work on Wix sites

Sites with 80 to 130ms of LoAF work Long Animation Frame work have a good INP most often: 97%, against 96% of all Wix sites. Sites with 130 to 250ms of LoAF work LoAF duration have it least often, at 95%.

Under 80ms of LoAF work is the most used: 51.4% of Wix sites. 80 to 130ms of LoAF work is 30.3% of Wix sites.

On React, 51% of sites use under 80ms of LoAF work Long Animation Frame work, and 96% of React sites have a good INP, against 96% of all sites.

FrameworkLong Animation Frame work on its sitesGood INP

Wix sites with Long Animation Frame work 3,884 sitesUnder 80ms LoAF work 51%80 to 130ms LoAF work 30%130 to 250ms LoAF work 13%96%

React 3,883 sitesUnder 80ms LoAF work 51%80 to 130ms LoAF work 30%130 to 250ms LoAF work 13%96%

Under 80ms LoAF work 80 to 130ms LoAF work 130 to 250ms LoAF work Over 250ms LoAF work

Does the framework explain the Long Animation Frame work difference?

On React, 97% of sites with 80 to 130ms of LoAF work Long Animation Frame work have a good INP, against 97% of React sites with under 80ms of LoAF work. Within React, sites with 80 to 130ms of LoAF work and under 80ms of LoAF work have a good INP about equally often.

Why Long Animation Frames pinpoint real INP bottlenecks

Unlike classic Long Tasks, the Long Animation Frames API captures the full rendering update alongside script execution, exposing forced synchronous reflows and expensive style recalculations. Across 1,996 sites (51.4%) with under 80ms of LoAF work, 97% pass field INP at an 78ms median, compared with 92% (95ms median) on the 5.6% (218) exceeding 250ms.