Third-party provider categories on Wix sites

Sites with RUM third-party technology categories pass all three Core Web Vitals most often: 89%, against 89% of all Wix sites.

Sites with framework third-party technology categories have a good LCP most often: 94%, against 94% of all Wix sites. Sites with bot detection third-party categories have it least often, at 85%.

Sites with bot detection third-party technology categories have a good INP most often: 97%, against 96% of all Wix sites. Sites with font service third-party categories have it least often, at 93%.

Sites with A/B testing third-party technology categories have a good CLS most often: 98%, against 97% of all Wix sites. Sites with font service third-party categories have it least often, at 96%.

RUM is the most used: 99.9% of Wix sites.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between framework and bot detection sits in resource load delay: 446 ms median for framework against 569 ms for bot detection. Overall median field LCP is 1.1s for framework (TTFB 404 ms, load delay 446 ms, load duration 110 ms, render delay 150 ms) versus 1.4s for bot detection.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between framework and bot detection sits in resource load delay: 446 ms median for framework against 569 ms for bot detection. Overall median field LCP is 1.1s for framework (TTFB 404 ms, load delay 446 ms, load duration 110 ms, render delay 150 ms) versus 1.4s for bot detection.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between framework and bot detection sits in resource load delay: 446 ms median for framework against 569 ms for bot detection. Overall median field LCP is 1.1s for framework (TTFB 404 ms, load delay 446 ms, load duration 110 ms, render delay 150 ms) versus 1.4s for bot detection.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between framework and bot detection sits in resource load delay: 446 ms median for framework against 569 ms for bot detection. Overall median field LCP is 1.1s for framework (TTFB 404 ms, load delay 446 ms, load duration 110 ms, render delay 150 ms) versus 1.4s for bot detection.

React sets the third-party technology categories to RUM on 100% of its sites, and 89% of React sites pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 89% of all sites.

React sets the third-party technology categories to RUM on 100% of its sites, and 94% of React sites have a good LCP, against 94% of all sites.

React sets the third-party technology categories to RUM on 100% of its sites, and 96% of React sites have a good INP, against 96% of all sites.

React sets the third-party technology categories to RUM on 100% of its sites, and 97% of React sites have a good CLS, against 97% of all sites.

FrameworkThird-party technology categories on its sitesPass all three

All Wix sites 5,621 sitesReal User Monitoring (RUM) 100%Content Delivery Networks (CDN) 100%JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 100%Analytics & Telemetry 31%Tag Managers 27%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 18%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 15%89%

React 5,620 sitesContent Delivery Networks (CDN) 100%Real User Monitoring (RUM) 100%JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 100%Analytics & Telemetry 31%Tag Managers 27%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 18%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 15%89%

Real User Monitoring (RUM) Content Delivery Networks (CDN) JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries Analytics & Telemetry Tag Managers Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) Marketing & Retargeting Pixels Display Ad Networks A/B Testing & Experimentation Bot Detection & Security (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile) Web Font Services Image CDNs Session Recording & Heatmaps Consent Management (CMP) Email & CRM Popups Ecommerce Platform Runtimes Personalization Engines Embedded Maps Customer Review Widgets CMS Platform Signatures Live Chat & Support Widgets

Does the framework explain the third-party technology categories difference?

Almost every site with RUM third-party technology categories is a React site, and almost every React site has RUM third-party technology categories, so the data can't tell RUM third-party technology categories and React apart.

Almost every site with framework third-party technology categories is a React site, and almost every React site has framework third-party technology categories, so the data can't tell framework third-party technology categories and React apart.

On React, 97% of sites with bot detection third-party technology categories have a good INP, against 96% of React sites with RUM. Within React, sites with bot detection and RUM have a good INP about equally often.

On React, 98% of sites with A/B testing third-party technology categories have a good CLS, against 97% of React sites with RUM. Within React, sites with A/B testing and RUM have a good CLS about equally often.