FCP distribution
How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for FCP distribution
How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1.7s
FCP (p75)
76.9% good
1.2s
FCP (median)
4.9s
FCP (p99)
Long tail
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
FCP Distribution page loads across good, needs improvement and poor
0 3,675 7,351 11,026 14,701
p50 = 1.2s
p75 = 1.7s
p90 = 2.5s
p99 = 4.9s
0–200 200–400 400–600 600–800 800–1000 1000–1200 1200–1400 1400–1600 1600–1800 1800–2000 2000–2200 2200–2400 2400–2600 2600–2800 2800–3000 3000–3200 3200+
Good (≤1.8s) Needs improvement Poor (>3s) Percentile markers Total: 92,445 sites
FCP 1.2s. p75 1.7s. p99 4.9s. 76.9% pass.
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
FCP Pass Rates share per category
Good Needs Improvement Poor
FCP passes on 76.9% of sites. 17.0% need improvement, 6.1% fail.
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → TTFB → INP → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.