Third-party provider categories on Wix sites

Sites with marketing pixel third-party technology categories pass all three Core Web Vitals most often: 89%, against 88% of all Wix sites.

Sites with RUM third-party technology categories have a good LCP most often: 92%, against 92% of all Wix sites. Sites with video player third-party categories have it least often, at 89%.

Sites with analytics third-party technology categories have a good INP most often: 100%, against 100% of all Wix sites. Sites with CDN third-party categories have it least often, at 100%.

Sites with RUM third-party technology categories have a good CLS most often: 96%, against 96% of all Wix sites. Sites with tag manager third-party categories have it least often, at 94%.

RUM is the most used: 99.9% of Wix sites. Marketing pixel is 14.6% of Wix sites.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between RUM and video player sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 343 ms median for RUM against 438 ms for video player. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for RUM (TTFB 343 ms, load delay 478 ms, load duration 259 ms, render delay 137 ms) versus 1.3s for video player.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between RUM and video player sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 343 ms median for RUM against 438 ms for video player. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for RUM (TTFB 343 ms, load delay 478 ms, load duration 259 ms, render delay 137 ms) versus 1.3s for video player.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between RUM and video player sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 343 ms median for RUM against 438 ms for video player. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for RUM (TTFB 343 ms, load delay 478 ms, load duration 259 ms, render delay 137 ms) versus 1.3s for video player.

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between RUM and video player sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 343 ms median for RUM against 438 ms for video player. Overall median field LCP is 1.2s for RUM (TTFB 343 ms, load delay 478 ms, load duration 259 ms, render delay 137 ms) versus 1.3s for video player.

On React, 100% of sites use CDN third-party technology categories, and 88% of React sites pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 88% of all sites.

On React, 100% of sites use CDN third-party technology categories, and 92% of React sites have a good LCP, against 92% of all sites.

On React, 100% of sites use CDN third-party technology categories, and 100% of React sites have a good INP, against 100% of all sites.

On React, 100% of sites use CDN third-party technology categories, and 96% of React sites have a good CLS, against 96% of all sites.

FrameworkThird-party technology categories on its sitesPass all three

All Wix sites 5,621 sitesReal User Monitoring (RUM) 100%JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 100%Content Delivery Networks (CDN) 100%Analytics & Telemetry 31%Tag Managers 27%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 18%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 15%88%

React 5,620 sitesContent Delivery Networks (CDN) 100%Real User Monitoring (RUM) 100%JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries 100%Analytics & Telemetry 31%Tag Managers 27%Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) 18%Marketing & Retargeting Pixels 15%88%

Real User Monitoring (RUM) JavaScript Frameworks & Libraries Content Delivery Networks (CDN) Analytics & Telemetry Tag Managers Video Players (YouTube, Vimeo) Marketing & Retargeting Pixels Display Ad Networks A/B Testing & Experimentation Bot Detection & Security (reCAPTCHA, Turnstile) Web Font Services Image CDNs Session Recording & Heatmaps Consent Management (CMP) Email & CRM Popups Ecommerce Platform Runtimes Personalization Engines Customer Review Widgets CMS Platform Signatures Live Chat & Support Widgets

Does the framework explain the third-party technology categories difference?

On React, 89% of sites with marketing pixel third-party technology categories pass all three Core Web Vitals, against 88% of React sites with RUM. Within React, sites with marketing pixel and RUM pass all three about equally often.

Almost every site with RUM third-party technology categories is a React site, and almost every React site has RUM third-party technology categories, so the data can't tell RUM third-party technology categories and React apart.

On React, 100% of sites with analytics third-party technology categories have a good INP, against 100% of React sites with RUM. Within React, sites with analytics and RUM have a good INP about equally often.

Almost every site with RUM third-party technology categories is a React site, and almost every React site has RUM third-party technology categories, so the data can't tell RUM third-party technology categories and React apart.