The State of Web Vitals

Analytics impact React sites

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes · React sites only
Metric LCP INP CLS
React Scoped to 9,570 sites out of 210,902 analyzed (frameworks) Compare with all sites →
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Analytics impact

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

3
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
7,226
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
2.4s
Best LCP (p75)
Matomo
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by LCP at p75, fastest first

# Provider LCP p75 Passing Sites
1 Matomo 2.4s 80.2%
220
2 Google Analytics 4 2.5s 75.0%
4,043
3 Universal Analytics 2.6s 72.9%
2,963
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing LCP per provider which group passes the LCP most often

ProviderSitesPassing LCPp75
AT Internet/Piano 0.1% 11 100% 1.6s
StatCounter 0.1% 9 100% 2.3s
Fathom 0.1% 5 100% 1.5s
Adobe Analytics 0.1% 11 91% 1.9s
Plausible 0.2% 21 89% 1.8s
Matomo 2.3% 220 80% 2.4s
PostHog 0.1% 8 80% 2.4s
Google Analytics 4 42.2% 4,043 75% 2.5s
Universal Analytics 31% 2,963 73% 2.6s
Snowplow 0.3% 25 71% 2.7s
Umami 0.1% 7 50% 3.3s
Mixpanel 0.1% 5 40% 3.2s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good LCP (2.5s at p75) · one value per site

80% of Matomo sites pass LCP. Universal Analytics trails 7 points behind, leaving 27% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Google Analytics 4 42.2%
752.5s
9971ms
750.10
711.9s
471.7s
Universal Analytics 31%
732.6s
9972ms
750.10
692.0s
461.8s
Matomo 2.3%
802.4s
9971ms
780.10
711.9s
421.5s
Snowplow 0.3%
712.7s
100104ms
430.17
642.0s
571.8s
Plausible 0.2%
891.8s
10067ms
560.12
891.5s
331.2s
AT Internet/Piano 0.1%
1001.6s
10086ms
1000.05
1001.2s
100639ms
Adobe Analytics 0.1%
911.9s
100112ms
820.04
821.7s
91608ms
StatCounter 0.1%
1002.3s
10059ms
1000.03
501.8s
01.7s
PostHog 0.1%
802.4s
100116ms
1000.04
602.3s
601.9s
Umami 0.1%
503.3s
10088ms
500.15
502.8s
02.1s
Fathom 0.1%
1001.5s
10069ms
500.20
1001.2s
501.2s
Mixpanel 0.1%
403.2s
100114ms
600.31
602.6s
601.8s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Matomo leads on LCP: 80% of its sites pass. Universal Analytics trails at 73%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · React sites (9,570) · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Want the polished comparison? View as a share-anchored page →
Related signals Marketing pixels (10) → Session recording (11) → Ad networks (9) → Reviews (8) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured