Analytics impact

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Analytics impact

Sites running each analytics provider, ranked by their CWV.

19
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
211,278
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
1.3s
Best LCP (p75)
GoatCounter
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by LCP at p75, fastest first

# Provider LCP p75 Passing Sites
1 GoatCounter 1.3s 100.0%
61
2 Clicky 1.6s 88.3%
246
3 Plausible 1.7s 90.7%
2,252
4 Chartbeat 1.7s 98.6%
83
5 Pirsch 1.8s 87.0%
125
6 Matomo 1.8s 88.8%
13,738
7 StatCounter 1.9s 84.6%
339
8 Snowplow 2.0s 88.0%
3,304
9 Fathom 2.0s 84.5%
344
10 Simple Analytics 2.0s 85.7%
99
11 Umami 2.0s 86.1%
938
12 Google Analytics 4 2.0s 85.4%
107,514
13 PostHog 2.0s 84.0%
325
14 AT Internet/Piano 2.1s 84.2%
584
15 Universal Analytics 2.1s 84.8%
80,431
16 Amplitude 2.2s 79.0%
185
17 Mixpanel 2.3s 79.1%
134
18 Adobe Analytics 2.3s 81.5%
488
19 Heap 2.6s 70.8%
88
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing LCP per provider which group passes the LCP most often

ProviderSitesPassing LCPp75
GoatCounter 0% 61 100% 1.3s
Chartbeat 0% 83 99% 1.7s
Parsely 0% 42 97% 2.0s
Plausible 1.1% 2,252 91% 1.7s
Matomo 6.5% 13,738 89% 1.8s
Clicky 0.1% 246 88% 1.6s
Snowplow 1.6% 3,304 88% 2.0s
Pirsch 0.1% 125 87% 1.8s
Umami 0.4% 938 86% 2.0s
Simple Analytics 0% 99 86% 2.0s
Google Analytics 4 51% 107,514 85% 2.0s
Universal Analytics 38.1% 80,431 85% 2.1s
StatCounter 0.2% 339 85% 1.9s
Fathom 0.2% 344 85% 2.0s
AT Internet/Piano 0.3% 584 84% 2.1s
PostHog 0.2% 325 84% 2.0s
Adobe Analytics 0.2% 488 82% 2.3s
Mixpanel 0.1% 134 79% 2.3s
Amplitude 0.1% 185 79% 2.2s
Heap 0% 88 71% 2.6s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good LCP (2.5s at p75) · one value per site

91% of Plausible sites pass LCP. Amplitude trails 12 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Google Analytics 4 51%
852.0s
9968ms
770.10
811.6s
601.2s
Universal Analytics 38.1%
852.1s
9968ms
770.10
801.6s
591.2s
Matomo 6.5%
891.8s
9971ms
780.09
851.5s
651.0s
Snowplow 1.6%
882.0s
9877ms
770.09
851.5s
601.1s
Plausible 1.1%
911.7s
10062ms
770.09
891.3s
72863ms
Umami 0.4%
862.0s
10067ms
750.11
861.4s
71911ms
AT Internet/Piano 0.3%
842.1s
9876ms
700.13
831.5s
67942ms
Adobe Analytics 0.2%
822.3s
93108ms
560.19
801.7s
72892ms
Fathom 0.2%
852.0s
9965ms
750.10
801.6s
68963ms
StatCounter 0.2%
851.9s
10067ms
750.10
821.5s
601.1s
PostHog 0.2%
842.0s
9992ms
860.07
831.5s
631.0s
Clicky 0.1%
881.6s
10062ms
630.15
861.3s
70895ms
Amplitude 0.1%
792.2s
94123ms
680.14
821.6s
71888ms
Mixpanel 0.1%
792.3s
9286ms
650.14
861.5s
71873ms
Pirsch 0.1%
871.8s
10072ms
830.09
921.3s
71970ms
Simple Analytics 0%
862.0s
10058ms
780.08
811.4s
61987ms
Heap 0%
712.6s
94128ms
740.12
801.4s
68951ms
Chartbeat 0%
991.7s
91113ms
690.12
971.3s
85599ms
GoatCounter 0%
1001.3s
10063ms
600.20
1001.0s
89569ms
Parsely 0%
972.0s
79170ms
150.18
911.7s
65966ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Plausible leads on LCP: 91% of its sites pass. Mixpanel trails at 79%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Marketing pixels (10) → Session recording (11) → Ad networks (9) → Reviews (8) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured