FCP distribution WordPress sites
How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for FCP distribution
How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
59.2%
of sites good on FCP
1.6s
Typical site
3.2s
Worst 10% of sites
59.2% of sites good on FCP. The typical site's FCP is 1.6s. The worst 10% are above 3.2s.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The FCP distribution site count at each FCP, from good to poor
0 1,715 3,430 5,145 6,860
p50 = 1.6s
p75 = 2.3s
p90 = 3.2s
p99 = 5.7s
0–200 200–400 400–600 600–800 800–1000 1000–1200 1200–1400 1400–1600 1600–1800 1800–2000 2000–2200 2200–2400 2400–2600 2600–2800 2800–3000 3000–3200 3200+
Good (≤1.8s) Needs improvement Poor (>3s) Percentile markers Total: 60,955 sites
Most sites are good on FCP. 59.2% sit at or under 1.8s. The typical site is at 1.6s, and 75% of sites stay under 2.3s. Only 40.8% miss good FCP. The slowest 10% are above 3.2s, and the slowest 1% are above 5.7s.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
The FCP pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor
Good Needs Improvement Poor
59.2% of sites are good on FCP. 28.8% are in the needs improvement band, between 1.8s and 3s. 12.0% are poor, above 3s. A miss is usually needs improvement, not poor.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → TTFB → INP → 203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.