INP distribution WordPress sites
How INP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for INP distribution
How INP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
98.1%
of sites pass INP
86ms
Typical site
129ms
Worst 10% of sites
98.1% of sites pass INP. The typical site's INP is 86ms. The worst 10% are above 129ms.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The INP distribution site count at each INP, from good to poor
0 4,914 9,827 14,741 19,654
p50 = 86ms
p75 = 104ms
p90 = 129ms
p99 = 248ms
0–25 25–50 50–75 75–100 100–125 125–150 150–175 175–200 200–225 225–250 250–275 275–300 300–325 325–350 350–375 375–400 400+
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Percentile markers Total: 46,332 sites
Most sites pass INP. 98.1% sit at or under 200ms. The typical site is at 86ms, and 75% of sites stay under 104ms. Only 1.9% fail INP. The slowest 10% are above 129ms, and the slowest 1% are above 248ms.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
The INP pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor
Good Needs Improvement Poor
98.1% of sites pass INP. 1.8% are in the needs improvement band, between 200ms and 500ms. 0.2% are poor, above 500ms. A miss is usually needs improvement, not poor.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → FCP → TTFB → 203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.