INP distribution WordPress sites
How INP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for INP distribution
How INP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
96.7%
of sites pass INP
96ms
Typical site
149ms
Worst 10% of sites
96.7% of sites pass INP. The typical site's INP is 96ms. The worst 10% are above 149ms.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The INP distribution site count at each INP, from good to poor
0 2,947 5,893 8,840 11,786
p50 = 96ms
p75 = 118ms
p90 = 149ms
p99 = 287ms
0–25 25–50 50–75 75–100 100–125 125–150 150–175 175–200 200–225 225–250 250–275 275–300 300–325 325–350 350–375 375–400 400+
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Percentile markers Total: 27,538 sites
Most sites pass INP. 96.7% sit at or under 200ms. The typical site is at 96ms, and 75% of sites stay under 118ms. Only 3.3% fail INP. The slowest 10% are above 149ms, and the slowest 1% are above 287ms.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
The INP pass rate the share of sites that are good, needs improvement and poor
Good Needs Improvement Poor
96.7% of sites pass INP. 3.1% are in the needs improvement band, between 200ms and 500ms. 0.2% are poor, above 500ms. A miss is usually needs improvement, not poor.
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · WordPress sites (63,295) · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → FCP → TTFB → 203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
203,892 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.