Synthetic interaction sub-parts and the Core Web Vitals
30.6% of audited sites (42,624) complete synthetic interactions in under 35ms (96% good field INP, 85ms median), while the 18.1% exceeding 110ms reach 92ms median field INP (95% good INP).
30.6% of sites use under 35ms lab interaction duration synthetic interaction sub-parts, and 96% of those sites have a good INP, against 95% of all sites.
INP pass rate
Sites with under 35ms lab interaction duration synthetic interaction sub-parts have a good INP most often: 96%, against 95% of all sites. Sites with over 110ms lab interaction duration lab interaction time have it least often, at 95%.
Synthetic interaction sub-parts usage
Under 35ms lab interaction duration is the most used: 30.6% of sites.
Synthetic interaction sub-parts per platform
Wix sets the synthetic interaction sub-parts to under 35ms lab interaction duration on 50% of its sites, and 97% of Wix sites have a good INP, against 95% of all sites. Squarespace sets the synthetic interaction sub-parts to over 110ms lab interaction duration on 53% of its sites, and 99% of Squarespace sites have a good INP.
Synthetic interaction sub-parts or the platform
Does the platform explain the synthetic interaction sub-parts difference?
On WordPress, 98% of sites with under 35ms lab interaction duration synthetic interaction sub-parts have a good INP, against 98% of WordPress sites with 35 to 65ms lab interaction duration. Within WordPress, sites with under 35ms lab interaction duration and 35 to 65ms lab interaction duration have a good INP about equally often. On Shopify, 98% of sites with under 35ms lab interaction duration synthetic interaction sub-parts have a good INP, against 97% of Shopify sites with 35 to 65ms lab interaction duration. Within Shopify, sites with under 35ms lab interaction duration and 35 to 65ms lab interaction duration have a good INP about equally often.
How input delay, processing, and presentation add up
Every user tap or click waits for background main-thread tasks to finish (input delay), runs event callbacks (processing), and recalculates styles and paints the next frame (presentation). Across 42,624 sites (30.6%) under 35ms in lab interactions, 96% pass field INP at an 85ms median, versus 95% (92ms median) on the 18.1% (25,246) exceeding 110ms.
Understanding synthetic interaction sub-parts
Keep event handler processing lean and yield before forcing layout or paint updates so total interaction latency stays well below the 200ms INP threshold. Across all audited sites, 30.6% finish under 35ms (96% good INP, 85ms median) versus 18.1% above 110ms (95% good INP, 92ms median).
By Arjen Karel · 210,902 crawled sites (196,263 with all devices Chrome field data, 139,150 sites with synthetic interaction sub-parts, October 2026). How we measured.