Cookie wall detected

Whether a consent wall blocks the page on first visit.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Cookie wall detected

Whether a consent wall blocks the page on first visit.

29.0%
of sites have it
27,534 of 94,910
91ms
median INP with it
84ms
median INP without
94,910
sites measured
all-device field data

29.0% of sites block their content behind a cookie wall.

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Cookie wall detected sites that have it vs sites that don't

Cookie wall detected
29%

29.0% of sites show a cookie consent wall (27,534 of 94,910). With show: LCP 1.7s, 79.0% pass. Without: LCP 1.4s, 84.3% pass. Correlates with +222ms LCP and −5.3 pp pass rate. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

A cookie wall blocks the page until the visitor chooses. For the vitals that means the first interaction of every new session happens on the wall: its buttons are the INP sample, its overlay is the first thing painted.

If the wall must exist, it must be the fastest thing on the page. Inline its styles, keep its script first-party, and make the buttons respond instantly. A laggy consent click is the worst first impression a page can measure.

How does a cookie wall affect the Core Web Vitals?

Having it makes no measurable difference to the INP: 96% pass with it, 94% without.

The gap is bigger on LCP: 79% pass with it, 84% without.

Related signals Optimization plugins → CMS → Third parties per page → Third-party categories → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured