TTFB distribution

How TTFB is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q2 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
1

At a glance the headline numbers for TTFB distribution

How TTFB is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.

0.0%
of sites good on TTFB
Typical site
Worst 10% of sites

0.0% of sites good on TTFB. The typical site's TTFB is . The worst 10% are above .

The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

TTFB Distribution the value at each percentile across all sites

0ms
p10
0ms
p25
0ms
p50
0ms
p75
0ms
p90
0ms
p99
800ms
1,800ms
The State of Web Vitals · Q2 2026 · 189,915 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

Time to First Byte is how long the browser waits for the server to start replying. It is a diagnostic metric, not a Core Web Vital, but it is the foundation the others are built on: nothing can render until the first byte arrives, so a slow TTFB pushes back every paint that follows. The causes are on the server and the network, slow backend processing, no caching, or a long trip to a distant origin.

Start by getting a fast, cacheable response out the door. Cache full pages where you can, put a CDN in front so visitors are served from nearby, and keep the backend work on each request small. Early Hints use that wait: the browser can start fetching critical resources while the server is still building the page.

Related signals FCP → LCP → CLS → INP → Chrome field data from 189,915 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured