FCP distribution
How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for FCP distribution
How FCP is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.
1.8s
FCP (p75)
76.0% good
1.2s
FCP (median)
5.0s
FCP (p99)
Long tail
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
FCP Distribution page loads across good, needs improvement and poor
0 2,325 4,649 6,974 9,298
p50 = 1.2s
p75 = 1.8s
p90 = 2.6s
p99 = 5s
0–200 200–400 400–600 600–800 800–1000 1000–1200 1200–1400 1400–1600 1600–1800 1800–2000 2000–2200 2200–2400 2400–2600 2600–2800 2800–3000 3000–3200 3200+
Good (≤1.8s) Needs improvement Poor (>3s) Percentile markers Total: 60,225 sites
FCP 1.2s. p75 1.8s. p99 5.0s. 76.0% pass.
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
FCP Pass Rates share per category
Good Needs Improvement Poor
FCP passes on 76.0% of sites. 17.7% need improvement, 6.3% fail.
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CLS → LCP → TTFB → INP → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.