TTFB distribution

How TTFB is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
1

At a glance the headline numbers for TTFB distribution

How TTFB is distributed across real-user data, plus pass-rate breakdown.

1.1s
TTFB (p75)
59.3% good
665ms
TTFB (median)
4.1s
TTFB (p99)
Long tail
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

TTFB Distribution page loads across good, needs improvement and poor

0 2,831 5,662 8,492 11,323
p50 = 665ms
p75 = 1.1s
p90 = 1.9s
p99 = 4.1s
0–150 150–300 300–450 450–600 600–750 750–900 900–1050 1050–1200 1200–1350 1350–1500 1500–1650 1650–1800 1800–1950 1950–2100 2100–2250 2250–2400 2400+
Good (≤800ms) Needs improvement Poor (>1.8s) Percentile markers Total: 57,230 sites

TTFB 665ms. p75 1.1s. p99 4.1s. 59.3% pass.

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

TTFB Pass Rates share per category

TTFB
59.3%
29.5%
11.2%
Good Needs Improvement Poor

TTFB passes on 59.3% of sites. 29.5% need improvement, 11.2% fail.

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals FCP → LCP → CLS → INP → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured