Third-party request share and the Core Web Vitals
39.6% of audited sites (83,462) keep third-party requests under 10% of total network traffic (99% good INP, 45ms median), while 17.6% have 25% to 50% third-party requests (99% good INP, 54ms median).
39.6% of sites use under 10% third-party requests third-party request share, and 99% of those sites have a good INP, against 99% of all sites.
16.1% of sites use over 50% third-party requests third-party request share, and 88% of those sites have a good LCP, against 86% of all sites.
Core Web Vitals pass rate
Sites with under 10% third-party requests third-party request share have a good INP most often: 99%, against 99% of all sites. Sites with over 50% third-party requests third-party share have it least often, at 98%.
Sites with over 50% third-party requests third-party request share have a good LCP most often: 88%, against 86% of all sites. Sites with under 10% third-party requests third-party share have it least often, at 86%.
Third-party request share usage
Under 10% third-party requests is the most used: 39.6% of sites.
Third-party request share per platform
Joomla sets the third-party request share to under 10% third-party requests on 70% of its sites, and 100% of Joomla sites have a good INP, against 99% of all sites. Wix sets the third-party request share to 25% to 50% third-party requests on 85% of its sites, and 100% of Wix sites have a good INP.
Joomla sets the third-party request share to under 10% third-party requests on 70% of its sites, and 93% of Joomla sites have a good LCP, against 86% of all sites. Wix sets the third-party request share to 25% to 50% third-party requests on 85% of its sites, and 92% of Wix sites have a good LCP.
Third-party request share or the platform
Does the platform explain the third-party request share difference?
On WordPress, 100% of sites with under 10% third-party requests third-party request share have a good INP, against 100% of WordPress sites with 10% to 25% third-party requests. Within WordPress, sites with under 10% third-party requests and 10% to 25% third-party requests have a good INP about equally often. On Shopify, 100% of sites with under 10% third-party requests third-party request share have a good INP, against 99% of Shopify sites with 10% to 25% third-party requests. Within Shopify, sites with under 10% third-party requests and 10% to 25% third-party requests have a good INP about equally often.
On WordPress, 75% of sites with over 50% third-party requests third-party request share have a good LCP, against 75% of WordPress sites with under 10% third-party requests. Within WordPress, sites with over 50% third-party requests and under 10% third-party requests have a good LCP about equally often. On Shopify, 99% of sites with under 10% third-party requests third-party request share have a good LCP, against 96% of Shopify sites with 10% to 25% third-party requests. Within Shopify, sites with under 10% third-party requests have a good LCP more often.
How external request share shapes main-thread contention and INP
Third-party request share measures the fraction of page requests served from external origins. Across 83,462 sites (39.6%) keeping third-party traffic under 10% and 56,530 sites (26.8%) between 10% and 25%, good INP reaches 99% and 99% (45ms and 51ms median). When third parties account for 25% to 50% of requests (17.6%), good INP drops to 99% (54ms median), while the 16.1% over 50% sit at 98% good INP (53ms median).
Understanding third-party request share
Keep third-party requests under 25% of total page traffic by self-hosting fonts and media on your primary CDN and consolidating tag-manager pixels into server-side endpoints. Across all audited sites, 39.6% stay under 10% third-party requests (99% good INP) and 17.6% sit at 25% to 50% (99% good INP).
By Arjen Karel · 210,902 crawled sites (69,745 with desktop Chrome field data, October 2026). How we measured.