Synthetic paint milestones and the Core Web Vitals

28.7% of audited sites (58,558) paint their hero element in under 300ms in the lab and pass field LCP at 93% (1.0s median), while the 22.2% exceeding 1,500ms in the lab pass field LCP at just 72% (1.8s median).

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes

28.7% of sites use under 300ms lab LCP synthetic paint milestones, and 93% of those sites have a good LCP, against 86% of all sites.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 204,313 sites with synthetic paint milestonesBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
1

LCP pass rate

Sites with under 300ms lab LCP synthetic paint milestones have a good LCP most often: 93%, against 86% of all sites. Sites with over 1,500ms lab LCP lab paint time have it least often, at 72%.

SitesGood, needs improvement, poor LCPMedian
All sites69,74586%1.4s
Under 300ms lab LCP 28.7%18,81693%1.0s
300 to 600ms lab LCP 24.9%18,12692%1.2s
600 to 1,500ms lab LCP 24.2%17,04686%1.6s
Over 1,500ms lab LCP 22.2%14,98872%1.8s
GoodNeeds improvementPoorSites: with Chrome field data
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 204,313 sites with synthetic paint milestonesBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Synthetic paint milestones usage

Under 300ms lab LCP is the most used: 28.7% of sites.

Under 300ms lab LCP 28.7% 300 to 600ms lab LCP 24.9% 600 to 1,500ms lab LCP 24.2% Over 1,500ms lab LCP 22.2%
Under 300ms lab LCP 28.7% 300 to 600ms lab LCP 24.9% 600 to 1,500ms lab LCP 24.2% Over 1,500ms lab LCP 22.2%
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 204,313 sites with synthetic paint milestonesBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

The four LCP phases

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between under 300ms lab LCP and over 1,500ms lab LCP sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 406 ms median for under 300ms lab LCP against 845 ms for over 1,500ms lab LCP. Overall median field LCP is 1.1s for under 300ms lab LCP (TTFB 406 ms, load delay 209 ms, load duration 96 ms, render delay 170 ms) versus 1.8s for over 1,500ms lab LCP.

Median LCP phase breakdown (Chrome field p75) Load delay Median LCP
Sites with synthetic paint milestones 50,474571 ms274 ms191 ms274 mslab 316 ms1.4s
Under 300ms lab LCP 12,923406 ms209 ms170 ms209 mslab 239 ms1.1s
300 to 600ms lab LCP 13,551499 ms263 ms184 ms263 mslab 304 ms1.2s
600 to 1,500ms lab LCP 12,876707 ms320 ms201 ms320 mslab 368 ms1.6s
Over 1,500ms lab LCP 11,124845 ms342 ms219 ms342 mslab 396 ms1.8s
TTFB Resource load delay Resource load time Element render delay
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 204,313 sites with synthetic paint milestonesBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Understanding synthetic paint milestones

How clean lab paint timings translate to real-user field LCP

Synthetic paint milestones measure your page without real-user cellular latency or cold device caches. A page that already takes over 1.5 seconds in a fast lab environment rarely survives real-world mobile networks. Across 58,558 sites (28.7%) painting under 300ms in the lab, 93% pass field LCP (1.0s median), dropping to 72% (1.8s median) on the 22.2% (45,370) over 1,500ms.

Optimize unthrottled server TTFB and eliminate render-blocking head resources so the baseline paint path finishes in under 600ms in clean lab conditions. Across all audited sites, 28.7% finish lab LCP under 300ms (93% good LCP, 1.0s median) versus 22.2% above 1,500ms (72% good LCP, 1.8s median).

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 204,313 sites with synthetic paint milestonesBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Platform & Framework Takeaways

How synthetic paint milestones plays out per platform

What the field data shows when you isolate a single CMS or framework.

WordPress 65,356 sites
89% vs 57% good field LCP (< 300ms vs > 1.5s lab)

WordPress sites over 1,500ms lab LCP pass field LCP at 57% vs 89% under 300ms.

Across WordPress sites, 32% take over 1,500ms to paint in unthrottled lab conditions (57% field LCP pass rate, 2.3s median) compared with 89% (1.3s median) on the 16% painting under 300ms.

Explore WordPress lab paint data →
Shopify 8,564 sites
68% stores painting in 300-1,500ms

68% of Shopify stores paint between 300ms and 1,500ms in the lab.

Across Shopify storefronts, 38% record a 600 to 1,500ms lab LCP (96% field LCP pass rate, 1.3s median) and 30% paint in 300 to 600ms (99%, 1.1s median).

Explore Shopify lab paint data →
React 9,561 sites
90% vs 62% good field LCP (< 300ms vs > 1.5s lab)

React sites painting under 300ms in the lab pass field LCP 28 points more often than sites over 1,500ms.

Across React sites, 46% paint their hero element in under 300ms in the lab (90% field LCP pass rate, 1.2s median) compared with 26% taking over 1,500ms (62% pass rate, 2.1s median).

Explore React lab paint data →
Wix 5,824 sites
63% sites under 300ms lab LCP

63% of Wix sites complete lab LCP in under 300ms.

Across Wix sites, 63% paint in under 300ms in the lab (95% field LCP pass rate, 1.1s median) compared with 88% on the 21% exceeding 1,500ms.

Explore Wix lab paint data →
Related signals Total Blocking Time (lab) → Main-thread CPU (lab) → Document lifecycle (lab) → By Arjen Karel · 210,902 crawled sites (69,745 with desktop Chrome field data, 204,313 sites with synthetic paint milestones, October 2026) · How we measured