Web font hosting sources and the Core Web Vitals

70.6% of font-using sites (130,081) self-host fonts on their own origin (85% good LCP, 1.4s median) and 31.3% use dedicated platform/CDN font hosts (86% good LCP), while the 41.0% loading from Google Fonts drop to 84% good LCP (1.5s median).

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes

4.5% of sites use Adobe Fonts web font hosting source, and 87% of those sites have a good LCP, against 86% of all sites.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 184,141 sites with web font hosting sourceBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
1

LCP pass rate

Sites with Adobe Fonts web font hosting source have a good LCP most often: 87%, against 86% of all sites. Sites with Google Fonts font source have it least often, at 84%.

SitesGood, needs improvement, poor LCPMedian
All sites69,74586%1.4s
Adobe Fonts (use.typekit.net) 4.5%3,63787%1.5s
Dedicated CDN / third-party font host 31.3%18,78286%1.4s
Self-hosted (same origin) 70.6%46,14685%1.4s
Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com / gstatic) 41.0%25,12684%1.5s
GoodNeeds improvementPoorSites: with Chrome field data
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 184,141 sites with web font hosting sourceBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Web font hosting source usage

Self-hosted fonts is the most used: 70.6% of sites. Adobe Fonts is 4.5% of sites.

Sites using each option (sites can use more than one) 184,141 sites
Self-hosted (same origin) 70.6% Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com / gstatic) 41.0% Dedicated CDN / third-party font host 31.3%
Self-hosted (same origin) 70.6% Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com / gstatic) 41.0% Dedicated CDN / third-party font host 31.3% Adobe Fonts (use.typekit.net) 4.5%
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 184,141 sites with web font hosting sourceBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

LCP phase breakdown by web font hosting source

Across the four LCP sub-parts in Chrome's field data, the largest gap between Adobe Fonts and Google Fonts sits in time to first byte (TTFB): 593 ms median for Adobe Fonts against 627 ms for Google Fonts. Overall median field LCP is 1.5s for Adobe Fonts (TTFB 593 ms, load delay 296 ms, load duration 126 ms, render delay 223 ms) versus 1.5s for Google Fonts.

Median LCP phase breakdown (Chrome field p75) Load delay Median LCP
Sites with web font hosting source 46,257582 ms281 ms195 ms281 mslab 324 ms1.4s
Self-hosted (same origin) 34,611610 ms280 ms196 ms280 mslab 323 ms1.4s
Adobe Fonts (use.typekit.net) 2,770593 ms296 ms223 ms296 mslab 345 ms1.5s
Google Fonts (fonts.googleapis.com / gstatic) 18,530627 ms296 ms210 ms296 mslab 342 ms1.5s
Dedicated CDN / third-party font host 13,949528 ms336 ms212 ms336 mslab 382 ms1.4s
TTFB Resource load delay Resource load time Element render delay
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 184,141 sites with web font hosting sourceBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Understanding web font hosting sources

Why external Google Fonts and Adobe Fonts cost extra connection round-trips

Since Chrome 86 partitioned the HTTP cache by top-level site, loading fonts from fonts.googleapis.com and fonts.gstatic.com no longer benefits from a shared cross-site cache and instead requires two cross-origin connection setups (one for CSS, one for WOFF2 files). Across 75,476 sites (41.0%) loading Google Fonts, good LCP is 84% (1.5s median), and across 8,267 sites (4.5%) loading Adobe Fonts it is 87% (1.5s median). Self-hosted fonts (70.6%) reach 85% good LCP (1.4s median) and dedicated platform CDNs (31.3%) reach 86% (1.4s median).

Self-host WOFF2 font files on your primary domain or CDN edge so font requests reuse the main HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 connection without extra DNS and TLS handshakes to fonts.googleapis.com or use.typekit.net. Across all font-using sites, 70.6% self-host fonts (85% good LCP) while 41.0% load Google Fonts (84% good LCP).

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · 69,745 with desktop field data · 184,141 sites with web font hosting sourceBy Arjen Karel · corewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Platform & Framework Takeaways

How web font hosting source plays out per platform

What the field data shows when you isolate a single CMS or framework.

Shopify 8,390 stores
97% vs 95% good LCP (Shopify self-hosted vs Google Fonts)

92.5% of Shopify stores serve fonts from their first-party domain (97% good LCP vs 95% with Google Fonts).

Shopify's font_face filter serves theme fonts from the storefront's /cdn/fonts/ path. Across Shopify, 92.5% of stores serve first-party fonts (97% good LCP, 1.3s median), 32.3% load Google Fonts (95% good LCP, 1.4s median), and 3.1% load Adobe Fonts (96%).

Read the Shopify font source breakdown →
React & Next.js 9,431 sites
85% vs 65% good LCP (CDN font host vs Google Fonts)

React & Next.js sites loading external Google Fonts (18.9%) pass LCP at 65% vs 85% on dedicated CDNs.

Across 9,431 font-using React sites, 77.1% serve fonts from external CDNs (85% good LCP, 1.4s median) and 18.9% load Google Fonts at runtime (65% good LCP, 2.0s median, 20 percentage points apart).

Related signals Script loading mix → DOM depth → Iframe loading → Scripts per page → By Arjen Karel · 210,902 crawled sites (69,745 with desktop Chrome field data, 184,141 sites with web font hosting source, October 2026) · How we measured