Frameworks performance
How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for Frameworks performance
How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.
10
Frameworks ranked
After min-sites filter
82,942
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
1.7s
Best LCP (p75)
htmx
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The ranking sorted by LCP at p75, fastest first
| # | Framework | LCP p75 | Passing | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | htmx | 1.7s | 97.3% | 141 | |
| 2 | Alpine.js | 1.7s | 92.8% | 1,306 | |
| 3 | Svelte | 1.9s | 88.3% | 219 | |
| 4 | Next.js | 2.0s | 86.1% | 854 | |
| 5 | jQuery | 2.0s | 85.5% | 67,958 | |
| 6 | Vue | 2.1s | 83.0% | 5,677 | |
| 7 | Gatsby | 2.2s | 83.0% | 105 | |
| 8 | React | 2.3s | 80.5% | 4,396 | |
| 9 | Nuxt | 2.5s | 75.8% | 628 | |
| 10 | Angular | 2.5s | 74.1% | 1,658 |
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
Passing LCP per framework which group passes the LCP most often
FrameworkSitesPassing LCPp75
htmx 0.1% 141 1.7s
Alpine.js 1.4% 1,306 1.7s
Svelte 0.2% 219 1.9s
Next.js 0.9% 854 2.0s
Remix 0% 26 2.0s
jQuery 71.6% 67,958 2.0s
Vue 6% 5,677 2.1s
Gatsby 0.1% 105 2.2s
React 4.6% 4,396 2.3s
Nuxt 0.7% 628 2.5s
Angular 1.7% 1,658 2.5s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good LCP (2.5s at p75) · one value per site
97% of htmx sites pass LCP. Angular trails 23 points behind, leaving 26% of its sites failing. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
jQuery 71.6%
862.0s
9962ms
780.09
801.6s
571.2s
Vue 6%
832.1s
9976ms
720.12
811.6s
611.1s
React 4.6%
812.3s
9965ms
790.08
791.6s
531.4s
Angular 1.7%
742.5s
97104ms
470.29
791.7s
82609ms
Alpine.js 1.4%
931.7s
10066ms
800.08
891.4s
621.1s
Next.js 0.9%
862.0s
94112ms
660.14
851.4s
71856ms
Nuxt 0.7%
762.5s
98101ms
650.16
781.7s
631.0s
Svelte 0.2%
881.9s
9986ms
790.08
871.4s
73867ms
htmx 0.1%
971.7s
10060ms
780.08
951.3s
621.1s
Gatsby 0.1%
832.2s
83130ms
650.13
941.0s
86624ms
Remix 0%
862.0s
10088ms
710.11
791.6s
461.1s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites
One row per framework, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
htmx leads on LCP: 97% of its sites pass. Angular trails at 74%. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Want the polished comparison? View as a share-anchored page →
Related signals CDN (7) → CMS (10) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.