Chat & messaging impact

Performance impact by chat provider.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Chat & messaging impact

Performance impact by chat provider.

13
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
5,663
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
1.9s
Best LCP (p75)
Help Scout Beacon
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by LCP at p75, fastest first

# Provider LCP p75 Passing Sites
1 Help Scout Beacon 1.9s 88.4%
54
2 Re:amaze 1.9s 88.6%
146
3 Gorgias 2.0s 92.2%
235
4 Chatwoot 2.1s 85.7%
72
5 Zendesk Chat 2.1s 84.4%
777
6 HubSpot Chat 2.1s 84.4%
1,539
7 Freshchat 2.2s 80.0%
89
8 Smartsupp 2.2s 84.7%
303
9 Tawk.to 2.2s 80.9%
1,102
10 Tidio 2.3s 78.4%
470
11 Crisp 2.3s 80.8%
284
12 LiveChat 2.4s 77.8%
373
13 Intercom 2.4s 77.6%
219
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing LCP per provider which group passes the LCP most often

ProviderSitesPassing LCPp75
Drift 0% 17 100% 1.6s
Gorgias 0.1% 235 92% 2.0s
Re:amaze 0.1% 146 89% 1.9s
Help Scout Beacon 0% 54 88% 1.9s
Chatwoot 0% 72 86% 2.1s
Smartsupp 0.1% 303 85% 2.2s
HubSpot Chat 0.7% 1,539 84% 2.1s
Zendesk Chat 0.4% 777 84% 2.1s
LiveAgent 0% 30 84% 2.1s
Front Chat 0% 13 82% 2.2s
tawk.to 0.5% 1,102 81% 2.2s
Crisp 0.1% 284 81% 2.3s
Freshchat 0% 89 80% 2.2s
Tidio 0.2% 470 78% 2.3s
LiveChat 0.2% 373 78% 2.4s
Intercom 0.1% 219 78% 2.4s
Olark 0% 47 75% 2.4s
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good LCP (2.5s at p75) · one value per site

92% of Gorgias sites pass LCP. Intercom trails 14 points behind. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
HubSpot Chat 0.7%
842.1s
9973ms
790.09
801.6s
601.2s
tawk.to 0.5%
812.2s
97121ms
720.11
741.8s
461.4s
Zendesk Chat 0.4%
842.1s
9974ms
760.10
811.6s
631.0s
Tidio 0.2%
782.3s
10072ms
740.11
741.8s
611.4s
LiveChat 0.2%
782.4s
9980ms
610.16
751.8s
541.3s
Smartsupp 0.1%
852.2s
10065ms
740.11
781.7s
461.3s
Crisp 0.1%
812.3s
9978ms
770.10
741.9s
511.3s
Gorgias 0.1%
922.0s
99105ms
780.09
931.3s
90531ms
Intercom 0.1%
782.4s
9891ms
740.11
821.5s
66947ms
Re:amaze 0.1%
891.9s
10096ms
810.09
941.2s
94519ms
Freshchat 0%
802.2s
93107ms
650.13
831.6s
72814ms
Chatwoot 0%
862.1s
95158ms
760.10
861.5s
63906ms
Help Scout Beacon 0%
881.9s
10080ms
740.10
841.5s
69881ms
Olark 0%
752.4s
9472ms
660.16
811.6s
561.0s
LiveAgent 0%
842.1s
10061ms
840.08
761.5s
481.2s
Drift 0%
1001.6s
10048ms
1000.02
1001.3s
38999ms
Front Chat 0%
822.2s
10090ms
730.11
641.9s
82673ms
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Gorgias leads on LCP: 92% of its sites pass. Intercom trails at 78%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Customer data platforms (6) → Font services (4) → A/B testing (12) → RUM (14) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured