Tag managers impact

Tag managers ranked by their performance impact.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Tag managers impact

Tag managers ranked by their performance impact.

7
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
49,666
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
69ms
Best INP (p75)
Google Tag Manager
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# Provider INP p75 Passing Sites
1 Google Tag Manager 69ms 99.0%
43,361
2 Matomo Tag Manager 70ms 99.6%
4,297
3 Piwik PRO Tag Manager 70ms 99.3%
228
4 Tealium iQ 79ms 98.4%
820
5 Segment 87ms 98.2%
630
6 Adobe Launch/DTM 102ms 95.5%
232
7 TagCommander 110ms 89.6%
98
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often

ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
Matomo Tag Manager 4.5% 4,297 100% 70ms
Piwik PRO Tag Manager 0.2% 228 99% 70ms
Google Tag Manager 45.7% 43,361 99% 69ms
Tealium iQ 0.9% 820 98% 79ms
Segment 0.7% 630 98% 87ms
Ensighten 0% 29 96% 95ms
Adobe Launch/DTM 0.2% 232 96% 102ms
TagCommander 0.1% 98 90% 110ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

No provider stands out: pass rates sit between 96% and 100%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Google Tag Manager 45.7%
852.1s
9969ms
770.10
811.6s
591.2s
Matomo Tag Manager 4.5%
891.8s
10070ms
780.09
851.5s
631.1s
Tealium iQ 0.9%
852.0s
9879ms
710.12
861.4s
67928ms
Segment 0.7%
872.1s
9887ms
750.10
821.6s
681.0s
Adobe Launch/DTM 0.2%
802.3s
96102ms
560.19
771.7s
67947ms
Piwik PRO Tag Manager 0.2%
882.0s
9970ms
730.11
841.4s
651.0s
TagCommander 0.1%
812.3s
90110ms
650.20
801.6s
59994ms
Ensighten 0%
712.6s
9695ms
670.20
711.9s
671.0s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Matomo Tag Manager leads on INP: 100% of its sites pass. Adobe Launch/DTM trails at 96%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Video (7) → Push notifications (4) → Analytics (20) → Ad networks (9) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured