Frameworks performance
How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for Frameworks performance
How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.
10
Frameworks ranked
After min-sites filter
82,942
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
99ms
Best INP (p75)
htmx
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first
| # | Framework | INP p75 | Passing | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | htmx | 99ms | 99.1% | 141 | |
| 2 | React | 103ms | 95.0% | 4,396 | |
| 3 | jQuery | 104ms | 96.7% | 67,958 | |
| 4 | Alpine.js | 115ms | 96.7% | 1,306 | |
| 5 | Vue | 128ms | 95.3% | 5,677 | |
| 6 | Svelte | 146ms | 93.0% | 219 | |
| 7 | Nuxt | 155ms | 89.7% | 628 | |
| 8 | Angular | 158ms | 89.0% | 1,658 | |
| 9 | Gatsby | 179ms | 82.0% | 105 | |
| 10 | Next.js | 219ms | 69.5% | 854 |
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
Passing INP per framework which group passes the INP most often
FrameworkSitesPassing INPp75
htmx 0.1% 141 99ms
jQuery 71.6% 67,958 104ms
Alpine.js 1.4% 1,306 115ms
Remix 0% 26 124ms
Vue 6% 5,677 128ms
React 4.6% 4,396 103ms
Svelte 0.2% 219 146ms
Nuxt 0.7% 628 155ms
Angular 1.7% 1,658 158ms
Gatsby 0.1% 105 179ms
Next.js 0.9% 854 219ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site
99% of htmx sites pass INP. Next.js trails 29 points behind, leaving 30% of its sites failing. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
jQuery 71.6%
812.2s
97104ms
880.03
741.8s
521.4s
Vue 6%
772.4s
95128ms
830.06
711.9s
521.3s
React 4.6%
862.0s
95103ms
920.01
821.5s
661.1s
Angular 1.7%
662.9s
89158ms
560.24
712.0s
77749ms
Alpine.js 1.4%
891.9s
97115ms
910.03
831.6s
571.1s
Next.js 0.9%
852.2s
70219ms
680.16
831.6s
68877ms
Nuxt 0.7%
712.6s
90155ms
690.14
721.9s
601.0s
Svelte 0.2%
832.1s
93146ms
870.04
811.6s
69942ms
htmx 0.1%
901.9s
9999ms
850.04
831.5s
501.1s
Gatsby 0.1%
752.5s
82179ms
640.19
921.4s
77782ms
Remix 0%
812.3s
96124ms
690.13
691.9s
461.4s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites
One row per framework, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
htmx leads on INP: 99% of its sites pass. Next.js trails at 70%. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Want the polished comparison? View as a share-anchored page →
Related signals CDN (7) → CMS (10) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.