Frameworks performance
How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.
1
At a glance the headline numbers for Frameworks performance
How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.
10
Frameworks ranked
After min-sites filter
82,942
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
60ms
Best INP (p75)
htmx
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2
The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first
| # | Framework | INP p75 | Passing | Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | htmx | 60ms | 100.0% | 141 | |
| 2 | jQuery | 62ms | 99.4% | 67,958 | |
| 3 | React | 65ms | 98.7% | 4,396 | |
| 4 | Alpine.js | 66ms | 99.7% | 1,306 | |
| 5 | Vue | 76ms | 99.0% | 5,677 | |
| 6 | Svelte | 86ms | 99.1% | 219 | |
| 7 | Nuxt | 101ms | 98.3% | 628 | |
| 8 | Angular | 104ms | 97.4% | 1,658 | |
| 9 | Next.js | 112ms | 93.5% | 854 | |
| 10 | Gatsby | 130ms | 82.6% | 105 |
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3
Passing INP per framework which group passes the INP most often
FrameworkSitesPassing INPp75
Remix 0% 26 88ms
htmx 0.1% 141 60ms
Alpine.js 1.4% 1,306 66ms
jQuery 71.6% 67,958 62ms
Svelte 0.2% 219 86ms
Vue 6% 5,677 76ms
React 4.6% 4,396 65ms
Nuxt 0.7% 628 101ms
Angular 1.7% 1,658 104ms
Next.js 0.9% 854 112ms
Gatsby 0.1% 105 130ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site
100% of htmx sites pass INP. Gatsby trails 17 points behind. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4
All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75
LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
jQuery 71.6%
862.0s
9962ms
780.09
801.6s
571.2s
Vue 6%
832.1s
9976ms
720.12
811.6s
611.1s
React 4.6%
812.3s
9965ms
790.08
791.6s
531.4s
Angular 1.7%
742.5s
97104ms
470.29
791.7s
82609ms
Alpine.js 1.4%
931.7s
10066ms
800.08
891.4s
621.1s
Next.js 0.9%
862.0s
94112ms
660.14
851.4s
71856ms
Nuxt 0.7%
762.5s
98101ms
650.16
781.7s
631.0s
Svelte 0.2%
881.9s
9986ms
790.08
871.4s
73867ms
htmx 0.1%
971.7s
10060ms
780.08
951.3s
621.1s
Gatsby 0.1%
832.2s
83130ms
650.13
941.0s
86624ms
Remix 0%
862.0s
10088ms
710.11
791.6s
461.1s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites
One row per framework, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.
htmx leads on INP: 100% of its sites pass. Gatsby trails at 83%. computed
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Want the polished comparison? View as a share-anchored page →
Related signals CDN (7) → CMS (10) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured
Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads. How we measured.