Frameworks performance

How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Phone field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Frameworks performance

How JavaScript frameworks score across LCP, INP and CLS.

10
Frameworks ranked
After min-sites filter
82,942
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
121ms
Best INP (p75)
jQuery
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# Framework INP p75 Passing Sites
1 jQuery 121ms 94.5%
67,958
2 React 121ms 92.9%
4,396
3 htmx 125ms 98.7%
141
4 Alpine.js 133ms 94.5%
1,306
5 Vue 145ms 92.4%
5,677
6 Svelte 158ms 89.8%
219
7 Nuxt 169ms 86.2%
628
8 Angular 188ms 79.6%
1,658
9 Gatsby 214ms 66.7%
105
10 Next.js 253ms 61.7%
854
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per framework which group passes the INP most often

FrameworkSitesPassing INPp75
htmx 0.1% 141 99% 125ms
jQuery 71.6% 67,958 95% 121ms
Alpine.js 1.4% 1,306 95% 133ms
React 4.6% 4,396 93% 121ms
Vue 6% 5,677 92% 145ms
Svelte 0.2% 219 90% 158ms
Remix 0% 26 87% 147ms
Nuxt 0.7% 628 86% 169ms
Angular 1.7% 1,658 80% 188ms
Gatsby 0.1% 105 67% 214ms
Next.js 0.9% 854 62% 253ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site

99% of htmx sites pass INP. Next.js trails 37 points behind, leaving 38% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
jQuery 71.6%
812.3s
95121ms
900.02
731.9s
521.3s
Vue 6%
772.4s
92145ms
840.04
711.9s
531.3s
React 4.6%
852.0s
93121ms
920.01
821.6s
681.0s
Angular 1.7%
642.9s
80188ms
580.26
682.0s
78731ms
Alpine.js 1.4%
882.0s
95133ms
920.01
791.7s
551.1s
Next.js 0.9%
832.2s
62253ms
670.17
831.6s
66900ms
Nuxt 0.7%
702.7s
86169ms
720.12
691.9s
581.0s
Svelte 0.2%
822.2s
90158ms
870.04
801.6s
70945ms
htmx 0.1%
892.0s
99125ms
890.03
871.6s
481.1s
Gatsby 0.1%
642.6s
67214ms
660.19
891.5s
74801ms
Remix 0%
772.3s
87147ms
770.07
592.1s
441.4s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per framework, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

htmx leads on INP: 99% of its sites pass. Next.js trails at 62%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · phone field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals CDN (7) → CMS (10) → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured