Page weight & requests

Every request the page makes on a cold load: request count and total transfer size over the wire.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites Q1 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Page weight & requests

Every request the page makes on a cold load: request count and total transfer size over the wire.

72
request count
on the typical page
2.5 MB
page weight
on the typical page
4.7 MB
1 in 4 pages exceed this
page weight
94,910
sites measured
desktop field data

The typical page weighs 2.5 MB across 72 requests.

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of page weight & requests — n

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 13887 27773
0 1–2 3 4–6 7–11 12–19 20–34 35–62 63–112 113–202 203–365 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP by page weight & requests — n which level passes the INP most often

Page weight & requests — nSitesPassing INPINP
1–2 1,124 97% 45ms
3 248 98% 46ms
4–6 728 97% 47ms
7–11 1,292 99% 45ms
12–19 3,406 98% 47ms
20–34 10,425 99% 44ms
35–62 23,047 99% 45ms
63–112 27,773 99% 48ms
113–202 17,897 99% 53ms
203–365 7,089 99% 58ms
>p98 1,878 98% 68ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Page weight & requests — n 72. p75 122. p99 436. At the low end (1–2): INP 45ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 68ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

Distribution & median INP site count and median INP at each level of page weight & requests — size

0ms 63ms 125ms 188ms 250ms
200ms
0 20968 41935
0 0.1–0.346 0.346–1.2 1.2–4.15 4.15–14.4 14.4–49.8 49.8–172 172–596 596–2065 2065–7149 7149–24753 >p98
Good (≤200ms) Needs improvement Poor (>500ms) Site count
The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
5

Passing INP by page weight & requests — size which level passes the INP most often

Page weight & requests — sizeSitesPassing INPINP
0 150 99% 46ms
0.1–0.346 193 99% 44ms
0.346–1.2 440 98% 45ms
1.2–4.15 368 96% 46ms
4.15–14.4 266 98% 46ms
14.4–49.8 526 98% 46ms
49.8–172 1,080 97% 45ms
172–596 5,619 99% 44ms
596–2065 30,318 99% 46ms
2065–7149 41,935 99% 51ms
7149–24753 12,119 99% 53ms
>p98 1,896 98% 55ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Faded rows: under 100 sites

Page weight & requests — size 2.5 MB. p75 4.7 MB. p99 34.1 MB. At the low end (0 KB): INP 46ms. At the high end (>p98): INP 55ms. computed

The State of Web Vitals · Q1 2026 · 94,910 sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
6

Why this matters for the Core Web Vitals, and where to start fixing it

Page weight is a bandwidth problem. The network can only move so many bytes per second and every resource on the page competes for that capacity. The LCP image does not load alone. It shares bandwidth with every script, stylesheet and tracking pixel that loads at the same time. A heavier page means the main content arrives later.

Request count matters next to the bytes. Every request adds queueing and scheduling overhead. On a busy connection important requests wait behind unimportant ones. Script bytes keep costing after the download. The main thread has to parse and execute them, and that delays interactions (INP). The resource type breakdown shows where the bytes sit.

How does page weight affect the Core Web Vitals?

Passing LCP barely moves across the range: 86% at one end, 82% at the other. This signal does not separate passing sites from failing ones.

Related signals Cookies per site → Stylesheet initiator → Script coverage (used vs unused) → font-display strategy → Chrome field data from 94,910 sites, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured