Chat & messaging impact

Performance impact by chat provider.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · All devices field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Chat & messaging impact

Performance impact by chat provider.

13
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
5,702
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
0.05
Best CLS (p75)
Help Scout Beacon
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 212,308 crawled sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by CLS at p75, fastest first

# Provider CLS p75 Passing Sites
1 Help Scout Beacon 0.05 88.9%
54
2 Gorgias 0.06 87.8%
238
3 Zendesk Chat 0.06 83.7%
779
4 Crisp 0.06 84.6%
286
5 Smartsupp 0.07 83.3%
303
6 Tidio 0.07 83.6%
472
7 Chatwoot 0.08 79.4%
72
8 Re:amaze 0.08 80.3%
149
9 HubSpot Chat 0.08 79.4%
1,552
10 Intercom 0.09 79.9%
221
11 Tawk.to 0.09 77.2%
1,111
12 Freshchat 0.13 72.7%
89
13 LiveChat 0.14 66.2%
376
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 212,308 crawled sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing CLS per provider which group passes the CLS most often

ProviderSitesPassing CLSp75
Drift 0% 17 100% 0.01
Help Scout Beacon 0% 54 89% 0.05
Gorgias 0.1% 238 88% 0.06
LiveAgent 0% 30 87% 0.07
Crisp 0.1% 286 85% 0.06
Zendesk Chat 0.4% 779 84% 0.06
Tidio 0.2% 472 84% 0.07
Smartsupp 0.1% 303 83% 0.07
Re:amaze 0.1% 149 80% 0.08
Intercom 0.1% 221 80% 0.09
HubSpot Chat 0.7% 1,552 79% 0.08
Chatwoot 0% 72 79% 0.08
Olark 0% 47 79% 0.08
tawk.to 0.5% 1,111 77% 0.09
Front Chat 0% 13 77% 0.10
Freshchat 0% 89 73% 0.13
LiveChat 0.2% 376 66% 0.14
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good CLS (0.1 at p75) · one value per site

88% of Gorgias sites pass CLS. LiveChat trails 22 points behind, leaving 34% of its sites failing. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 212,308 crawled sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
HubSpot Chat 0.7%
772.4s
96120ms
790.08
711.9s
531.3s
tawk.to 0.5%
762.4s
94138ms
770.09
692.0s
471.5s
Zendesk Chat 0.4%
802.2s
95123ms
840.06
761.8s
571.1s
Tidio 0.2%
712.7s
97123ms
840.07
672.2s
551.6s
LiveChat 0.2%
752.5s
94127ms
660.14
702.0s
501.4s
Smartsupp 0.1%
832.2s
96124ms
830.07
741.8s
411.4s
Crisp 0.1%
712.7s
93130ms
850.06
662.1s
511.4s
Gorgias 0.1%
862.1s
87171ms
880.06
901.4s
90577ms
Intercom 0.1%
722.7s
87161ms
800.09
741.9s
631.1s
Re:amaze 0.1%
931.8s
92129ms
800.08
941.2s
87657ms
Freshchat 0%
772.5s
85157ms
730.13
721.8s
66967ms
Chatwoot 0%
812.3s
97147ms
790.08
811.6s
651.1s
Help Scout Beacon 0%
852.2s
98124ms
890.05
801.7s
73857ms
Olark 0%
832.1s
93131ms
790.08
831.5s
56971ms
LiveAgent 0%
832.2s
100121ms
870.07
771.8s
501.2s
Drift 0%
1001.7s
100104ms
1000.01
941.5s
501.0s
Front Chat 0%
692.6s
92147ms
770.10
542.4s
691.2s
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

Gorgias leads on CLS: 88% of its sites pass. LiveChat trails at 66%. computed

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 212,308 crawled sites · all devices field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Customer data platforms (6) → Font services (4) → A/B testing (12) → RUM (14) → 212,308 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured