Scheduling impact

Performance impact by scheduling provider.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Scheduling impact

Performance impact by scheduling provider.

1
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
1,741
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
61ms
Best INP (p75)
Calendly
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by INP at p75, fastest first

# Provider INP p75 Passing Sites
1 Calendly 61ms 99.6%
1,741
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing INP per provider which group passes the INP most often

ProviderSitesPassing INPp75
Cal.com 0% 18 100% 74ms
Calendly 0.8% 1,741 100% 61ms
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good INP (200ms at p75) · one value per site
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Calendly 0.8%
872.0s
10061ms
780.09
831.5s
631.1s
Cal.com 0%
802.5s
10074ms
1000.06
1001.3s
50934ms
Acuity Scheduling 0%
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 210,902 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Reviews (8) → Customer data platforms (6) → Analytics (20) → Consent platforms (16) → 210,902 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured