Scheduling impact

Performance impact by scheduling provider.

Field data PhoneDesktopAll Scope All sites October 2026 edition · Desktop field outcomes
Metric LCP INP CLS
1

At a glance the headline numbers for Scheduling impact

Performance impact by scheduling provider.

1
Providers ranked
After min-sites filter
1,753
Sites in sample
Combined across all items
0.09
Best CLS (p75)
Calendly
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 212,308 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
2

The ranking sorted by CLS at p75, fastest first

# Provider CLS p75 Passing Sites
1 Calendly 0.09 77.5%
1,753
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 212,308 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
3

Passing CLS per provider which group passes the CLS most often

ProviderSitesPassing CLSp75
Cal.com 0% 18 100% 0.06
Calendly 0.8% 1,753 78% 0.09
Good Needs Improvement Poor Sorted best-passing first · median colored by its own rating · pass = good CLS (0.1 at p75) · one value per site
The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 212,308 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
4

All five vitals at once the whole category without toggling - cell is the pass rate, small number the p75

LCP
INP
CLS
FCP
TTFB
Calendly 0.8%
872.0s
9961ms
780.09
831.5s
631.0s
Cal.com 0%
802.5s
10074ms
1000.06
1001.3s
50934ms
Acuity Scheduling 0%
60%95%+ passing Cell: pass rate, small number = p75 · faded rows: under 100 sites

One row per provider, one column per vital - the cell is the share of sites passing, the small number the p75. No toggling needed to see where the category actually differs.

The State of Web Vitals · October 2026 · 212,308 crawled sites · desktop field datacorewebvitals.io/state-of-cwv
Related signals Reviews (8) → Customer data platforms (6) → Analytics (20) → Consent platforms (16) → 212,308 crawled sites with Chrome field data, representing millions of real page loads · How we measured